Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25133091›Full record

ArticleSpringerPlus2014

Is radiotherapy necessary for intermediate risk ductal carcinoma in situ after breast conserving surgery?

Taeryung Kim, Heung Kyu Park, Kyung Hee Lee, Kwan Il Kim, Kyu Chan Lee, Jeong Suk Ahn, Kwang-Pil Ko

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in SpringerPlus, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: an update for the pathologist in the era of individualized risk assessment and tailored therapies.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2019
    Review
  3. Ductal carcinoma in-situ arising within benign phyllodes tumours.Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England · 2018
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Taeryung KimBreast Cancer Center, Department of Surgery, Gachon University Gill Hospital, 1198, Guwol-dong, Incheon, 405-760 Korea.
Heung Kyu ParkBreast Cancer Center, Department of Surgery, Gachon University Gill Hospital, 1198, Guwol-dong, Incheon, 405-760 Korea.
Kyung Hee LeeBreast Cancer Center, Department of Surgery, Gachon University Gill Hospital, 1198, Guwol-dong, Incheon, 405-760 Korea.
Kwan Il KimBreast Cancer Center, Department of Surgery, Gachon University Gill Hospital, 1198, Guwol-dong, Incheon, 405-760 Korea.
Kyu Chan LeeBreast Cancer Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Gachon University Gill Hospital, Incheon, Korea.
Jeong Suk AhnBreast Cancer Center, Department of Pathology, Gachon University Gill Hospital, Incheon, Korea.
Kwang-Pil KoDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Gachon University Graduate School of Medicine, Incheon, Korea.
Gachon University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Identifying ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) patients at highest risk for recurrence after breast conserving surgery (BCS) remains a clinical concern. Subjecting all such patients to radiotherapy may be unnecessary. The Van Nuys Prognostic Index (VNPI) is a simple scoring system for predicting the risk of local recurrence in patients with DCIS. We reviewed patients with DCIS applying the VNPI score system. A total of 184 DCIS patients who underwent surgery at our institution between January 2003 and December 2011 were identified. Patients were not treated according to VNPI guidelines; rather, radiation therapy was applied at each surgeon's discretion. All patients with hormonal receptor positive tumors were treated with hormonal therapy. Pathology reports were reviewed and VNPI scores of each DCIS calculated. Of the 184 patients, 52 (28.3%), 115 (62.5%) and 17 (9.2%) had low, intermediate and high VNPI scores, respectively. Six of the 184 patients (3.3%) developed ipsilateral local recurrence, five in the intermediate and one in the high VNPI score group. Of the five in the intermediate group, three (60%) were in patients with ER-negative tumors. VNPI score itself was not associated with recurrence (P = 0.145). Factors associated with recurrence included tumor size (hazard ratio [HR] 6.88), grade (HR 9.07) and hormone receptor status (HR 11.75). Radiotherapy did not significantly improve recurrence rates in patients with low and intermediate risk DCIS, especially in those with ER-positive tumors. Radiotherapy can be omitted in patients with ER-positive intermediate score DCIS and in patients with low score DCIS.

Indexed as

Breast cancerDuctal carcinoma in situERRadiotherapyRecurrenceVan Nuys Prognostic index

Identifiers

PMID25133091
PMCPMC4132440
OpenAlexW2108415657

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.