Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25132943›Full record

ArticleKorean journal of urology2014

Associations between presenting symptoms, clinicopathological parameters, and prognosis in a contemporary series of patients with renal cell carcinoma.

Sebastian L Hofbauer, Michela de Martino, Christoph Seemann, Nura Zamani, Ilaria Lucca, Andrea Haitel, Shahrokh F Shariat, Tobias Klatte

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Korean journal of urology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Clinicohistological characteristics of renal cell carcinoma in children: A multicentre study.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Sebastian L HofbauerDepartment of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna, Austria.
Michela de MartinoDepartment of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna, Austria.
Christoph SeemannDepartment of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna, Austria.
Nura ZamaniDepartment of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna, Austria.
Ilaria LuccaDepartment of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna, Austria. ; Department of Urology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Andrea HaitelClinical Institute of Pathology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna, Austria.
Shahrokh F ShariatDepartment of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna, Austria.
Tobias KlatteDepartment of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna, Austria.
Medical University of Vienna · ATVienna General Hospital · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate the impact of presenting symptoms on survival in a contemporary series of patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC). MATERIALS AND

methodsWe prospectively recorded data on the presenting symptoms, pathology, and RCC-specific survival of 633 consecutive RCC patients who underwent surgery between 2003 and 2012.

resultsFour hundred thirty-three RCCs (68%) were incidental, 111 (18%) were associated with local symptoms, and 89 (14%) were associated with systemic symptoms. Among those with incidental RCC, 317 patients (73%) were completely asymptomatic and 116 patients (27%) presented with symptoms not related to the tumor. During a median follow-up interval of 40 months (interquartile range: 39 to 69 months), 77 patients died from RCC. In univariate analyses, symptom classification was significantly associated with RCC-specific survival (p<0.001). Patients with incidental RCC and unrelated symptoms tended to have worse prognosis than did patients who were completely asymptomatic, although this difference was not statistically significant (p=0.057). The symptom classification was associated with advanced TNM stages (p<0.001) and grade (p<0.001).

conclusionsThis study confirms that presenting symptoms are associated with tumor characteristics and survival. The majority of RCCs are diagnosed incidentally in patients without any symptoms or with symptoms not related to RCC. Patients in the latter group tend to have a worse prognosis than do patients who are completely asymptomatic. With the increasing number of incidentally diagnosed RCCs, substratification of patients with incidental tumors may be prognostically relevant.

Indexed as

AgedCarcinoma, Renal CellFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateKidney NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingNephrectomyPrognosisProspective StudiesDiagnosisPrognosisRenal cell carcinomaSymptoms

Identifiers

PMID25132943
PMCPMC4131077
OpenAlexW2105547063

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.