ArticleColloids and surfaces. B, Biointerfaces1999
Feasibility of measuring antigen-antibody interaction forces using a scanning force microscope.
Article in Colloids and surfaces. B, Biointerfaces, 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The molecular affinity scanning force microscopy (MASFM) described in this study was developed in an effort to test the possibility of antigen-antibody binding measurement using force-separation distance profiles. The MASFM configuration was comprised of a spherical glass bead as an MASFM probe, to which the fluorescein antigen has been covalently attached, and a silicon dioxide-based substrate, to which the antifluorescyl IgG antibody was covalently bound. The bead was glued to the tip of a commercial SFM cantilever. Adhesion forces have been measured between two different specific antigen-antibody pairs and between nonspecific surfaces bearing only glycidoxypropylsilane immobilization chemistry. In force-separation (F-s) measurements, nonspecific forces displayed relatively few force discontinuities and mean adhesion forces lower than those found for specific antigen-antibody measurements. Force-separation profiles measured between specific antigen-antibody pairs showed many discontinuities and had higher mean forces. Positive controls revealed that the mean forces were slightly reduced by the addition of free ligand. The magnitude of mean forces did not correlate with the respective activation enthalpies of the proteins, as would be expected. At lower force values the force histograms for the specific pairs and for positive controls were indistinguishable. None of the force-separation data sets could fit a Poisson discrete-force model. This statistical analysis showed a large relative contribution from nonspecific interactions. It is concluded that the use of the large sphere as an SFM probe is counterproductive: while the large sphere does sample a larger number of specific interactions during each measurement, it also samples at the same time a large proportion of nonspecific forces. The presence of the nonspecific force contributions is likely due to the deformation of the polymerized GPS spacer layer which is thought to be delaminated from the surface upon the application of tension across the specific antigen-antibody bonds.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.