Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25132690›Full record

ArticleStat2013

Variable Selection in Generalized Functional Linear Models.

J Gertheiss, A Maity, A-M Staicu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Stat, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Inference in Functional Linear Quantile Regression.Journal of multivariate analysis · 2022
    Article
  7. Understanding rice growth-promoting potential ofCurrent research in microbial sciences · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Methods for scalar-on-function regression.International statistical review = Revue internationale de statistique · 2017
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Generalized Scalar-on-Image Regression Models via Total Variation.Journal of the American Statistical Association · 2017
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Interaction Models for Functional Regression.Computational statistics & data analysis · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

J GertheissDepartment of Animal Sciences, Georg-August-Universität Göttingen, Germany.
A MaityDepartment of Statistics, North Carolina State University, USA.
A-M StaicuDepartment of Statistics, North Carolina State University, USA.

Funding

Statistical Methods for Analysis of High-Dimensional Gene and Environment DataR00ES017744 · NIEHS · NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY RALEIGH · PI MAITY, ARNAB · 2011 to 2013
$663k
NIEHS NIH HHS R00 ES017744
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Modern research data, where a large number of functional predictors is collected on few subjects are becoming increasingly common. In this paper we propose a variable selection technique, when the predictors are functional and the response is scalar. Our approach is based on adopting a generalized functional linear model framework and using a penalized likelihood method that simultaneously controls the sparsity of the model and the smoothness of the corresponding coefficient functions by adequate penalization. The methodology is characterized by high predictive accuracy, and yields interpretable models, while retaining computational efficiency. The proposed method is investigated numerically in finite samples, and applied to a diffusion tensor imaging tractography data set and a chemometric data set.

Indexed as

group lassomultiple functional predictorspenalized estimationvariable selection

Identifiers

PMID25132690
PMCPMC4131701

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.