Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25132388›Full record

ArticlePublic health2014

Chronicling changes to the chronic disease prevention landscape in Canada's public health system 2004-2010.

N Hanusaik, D Contandriopoulos, N Kishchuk, K Maximova, G Paradis, J L O'Loughlin, PHORCAST Decision-makers Advisory Committee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Public health, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Systemic and organizational barriers to primary chronic disease prevention: a qualitative study of public health organizations in Canada.Health promotion and chronic disease prevention in Canada : research, policy and practice · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Chronic disease prevention evaluation in Ontario's public health system: a qualitative needs assessment.Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique · 2020
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

N HanusaikCentre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CRCHUM), Montréal, Québec, Canada. Electronic address: nancy.hanusaik@mail.mcgill.ca.
D ContandriopoulosUniversité de Montréal, Faculté de sciences infirmières, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Institut de recherche en santé publique de l'Université de Montréal (IRSPUM), Montréal, Québec, Canada.
N KishchukProgram Evaluation & Beyond Inc., Montréal, Québec, Canada; Université de Montréal, Département de médecine sociale et préventive, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
K MaximovaUniversity of Alberta, Department of Public Health Sciences, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
G ParadisMcGill University, Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Occupational Health, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Institut national de santé publique du Québec (INSPQ), Montréal, Québec, Canada.
J L O'LoughlinCentre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CRCHUM), Montréal, Québec, Canada; Université de Montréal, Département de médecine sociale et préventive, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Institut national de santé publique du Québec (INSPQ), Montréal, Québec, Canada.
PHORCAST Decision-makers Advisory Committee
Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal · CAUniversité de Montréal · CAInstitut National de Santé Publique du Québec · CAUniversity of Alberta · CA

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research PHE-85197
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The collective impact of major shifts in public health infrastructure and numerous new chronic disease prevention (CDP) capacity-building initiatives that have taken place in Canada over the last decade is unknown. The objective of this study was to determine if CDP capacity (i.e., skills and resources) and involvement in CDP programming improved in public health organizations in Canada from 2004 to 2010. Data for this repeated cross-sectional study were drawn from two waves of a national census of organizations mandated to carry out primary prevention of chronic disease and/or promotion of healthy eating, physical activity and tobacco control. Medians for continuous variables and frequencies for categorical variables were compared across time. Neither resources nor level of priority for CDP increased over time. There was little difference in the proportion of organizations with high levels of skills and involvement in core CDP practices (i.e., needs assessment, identification of relevant practices, planning, evaluation). Skills and involvement in CDP risk factor programming showed some gains, some steady states and some losses. Specifically, skill and involvement in tobacco control programming declined markedly while the proportion of organizations involved in healthy eating and physical activity programming increased. Skills to address and involvement in programming related to social determinants of health remained low over time as did involvement in programming addressing multiple risk factors concurrently. The lack of marked improvement in CDP capacity between 2004 and 2010 against a backdrop of initiatives favourable to strengthening the preventive health system in Canada suggests that efforts may have fallen short.

Indexed as

CanadaCapacity BuildingChronic DiseaseCross-Sectional StudiesHealth PromotionHumansPrimary PreventionProgram EvaluationPublic Health AdministrationCanadaChronic disease preventionFollow-up studyOrganizational capacityPublic health services and systemsSurvey

Identifiers

PMID25132388
PMCPMC7111625
OpenAlexW2023556676

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.