Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25132345›Full record

ArticleAnatomical record (Hoboken, N.J. : 2007)2014

Laminar and neurochemical organization of the dorsal cochlear nucleus of the human, monkey, cat, and rodents.

Joan S Baizer, Keit Men Wong, Nicholas A Paolone, Nadav Weinstock, Richard J Salvi, Senthilvelan Manohar, Sandra F Witelson, James F Baker, Chet C Sherwood, Patrick R Hof

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Anatomical record (Hoboken, N.J. : 2007), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Comparison of Responses to DCN vs. VCN Stimulation in a Mouse Model of the Auditory Brainstem Implant (ABI).Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Species Differences in the Organization of the Ventral Cochlear Nucleus.Anatomical record (Hoboken, N.J. : 2007) · 2018
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Joan S BaizerDepartment of Physiology and Biophysics, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York.
Keit Men Wong
Nicholas A Paolone
Nadav Weinstock
Richard J Salvi
Senthilvelan Manohar
Sandra F Witelson
James F Baker
Chet C Sherwood
Patrick R Hof
University at Buffalo, State University of New York · USAllen Institute for Brain Science · USGeorge Washington University · USMcMaster University · CANorthwestern University · US

Funding

Blast Wave Effects: Hearing, Memory, TherapyR01DC011808 · NIDCD · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI SALVI, RICHARD J · 2012 to 2016
$2.0M
NIDCD NIH HHS 5-R01DC011808NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC011808
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The dorsal cochlear nucleus (DCN) is a brainstem structure that receives input from the auditory nerve. Many studies in a diversity of species have shown that the DCN has a laminar organization and identifiable neuron types with predictable synaptic relations to each other. In contrast, studies on the human DCN have found a less distinct laminar organization and fewer cell types, although there has been disagreement among studies in how to characterize laminar organization and which of the cell types identified in other animals are also present in humans. We have reexamined DCN organization in the human using immunohistochemistry to analyze the expression of several proteins that have been useful in delineating the neurochemical organization of other brainstem structures in humans: nonphosphorylated neurofilament protein (NPNFP), nitric oxide synthase (nNOS), and three calcium-binding proteins. The results for humans suggest a laminar organization with only two layers, and the presence of large projection neurons that are enriched in NPNFP. We did not observe evidence in humans of the inhibitory interneurons that have been described in the cat and rodent DCN. To compare humans and other animals directly we used immunohistochemistry to examine the DCN in the macaque monkey, the cat, and three rodents. We found similarities between macaque monkey and human in the expression of NPNFP and nNOS, and unexpected differences among species in the patterns of expression of the calcium-binding proteins.

Indexed as

AnimalsCalcium-Binding ProteinsCatsChinchillaCochlear NucleusGuinea PigsHumansMacacaNeurofilament ProteinsNitric Oxide SynthaseRatsCalcium-Binding ProteinsNeurofilament ProteinsNitric Oxide Synthaseauditory systembrainstemcochleahair cellstinnitus

Identifiers

PMID25132345
PMCPMC4170232
OpenAlexW1556498266

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.