Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25131714›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of medical genetics. Part A2014

What parents want to know about the storage and use of residual newborn bloodspots.

Jeffrey R Botkin, Erin Rothwell, Rebecca A Anderson, Aaron Goldenberg, Miriam Kuppermann, Siobhan M Dolan, Nancy C Rose, Louisa Stark

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of medical genetics. Part A, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02676245 (Parent Education and Choice About Newborn Screening and Bloodspot Retention), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02676245 nacompletednot on this map

Parent Education and Choice About Newborn Screening and Bloodspot Retention

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of UtahRan2013 to 2014Enrolled664ConditionsNeonatal ScreeningArmsViewing Newborn Screening movie, Viewing Residual Dried Blood Spot movie
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Deliberative Discussion Focus Groups.Qualitative health research · 2016
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Jeffrey R BotkinUniversity of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah.
Erin Rothwell
Rebecca A Anderson
Aaron Goldenberg
Miriam Kuppermann
Siobhan M Dolan
Nancy C Rose
Louisa Stark
University of Utah · USAlbert Einstein College of Medicine · USCase Western Reserve University · USIntermountain Healthcare · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

Parent Education about Newborn Screening and Bloodspot RetentionR01HG006266 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI BOTKIN, JEFFREY R. · 2011 to 2014
$2.1M
NHGRI NIH HHS 1R01HG006266-02NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG006266
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many state newborn screening programs retain residual newborn screening bloodspots for a variety of purposes including quality assurance, biomedical research, and forensic applications. This project was designed to determine the information that prospective parents want to know about this practice. Eleven focus groups were conducted in four states. Pregnant women and their partners and parents of young children (N = 128) were recruited from the general public. Focus group participants viewed two educational movies on newborn screening and DBS retention and use. Transcripts were analyzed with qualitative methods and the results were synthesized to identify key information items. We identified 14 categories of information from the focus groups that were synthesized into seven items prospective parents want to know about residual DBS. The items included details about storage, potential uses, risks and burdens, safeguards, anonymity, return of results, and parental choice. For those state programs that retain residual dried bloodspots, inclusion of the seven things parents want to know about residual dried bloodspots in educational materials may improve parental understanding, trust, and acceptance of the retention and use of stored bloodspots.

Indexed as

Blood Specimen CollectionHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeNeonatal ScreeningParentsAdolescentAdultBiomedical ResearchFemaleFocus GroupsHealth Care SurveysHumansInfant, NewbornMaleMiddle AgedPatient PreferenceQualitative Researchdried bloodspotseducationnewborn screeningpublic healthresearch

Identifiers

PMID25131714
PMCPMC4205184
OpenAlexW2086675445

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.