Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25131640›Full record

ReviewExperimental neurology2015

Epigenetics and sex differences in the brain: A genome-wide comparison of histone-3 lysine-4 trimethylation (H3K4me3) in male and female mice.

Erica Y Shen, Todd H Ahern, Iris Cheung, Juerg Straubhaar, Aslihan Dincer, Isaac Houston, Geert J de Vries, Schahram Akbarian, Nancy G Forger

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Experimental neurology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed, 89 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Sex-specific epigenetic programming in renal fibrosis and inflammation.American journal of physiology. Renal physiology · 2023
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. The Role of Transposable Elements in Sexual Development.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2022
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Erica Y ShenDepartment of Psychiatry, Friedman Brain Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA; Department of Neuroscience, Friedman Brain Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA.
Todd H AhernCenter for Behavioral Neuroscience, Department of Psychology, Quinnipiac University, Hamden, CT 06518, USA.
Iris CheungBrudnick Neuropsychiatric Research Institute, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA 01604, USA.
Juerg StraubhaarBrudnick Neuropsychiatric Research Institute, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA 01604, USA.
Aslihan DincerDepartment of Psychiatry, Friedman Brain Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA; Department of Genetics and Genomics Science, Icahn Institute for Genomics and Multiscale Biology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA.
Isaac HoustonBrudnick Neuropsychiatric Research Institute, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA 01604, USA.
Geert J de VriesNeuroscience Institute, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA 30302, USA.
Schahram AkbarianDepartment of Psychiatry, Friedman Brain Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA; Department of Neuroscience, Friedman Brain Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA.
Nancy G ForgerNeuroscience Institute, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA 30302, USA. Electronic address: nforger@gsu.edu.
Allen Institute for Brain Science · USGeorgia State University · USNeuropsychiatric Research Institute · USIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · USQuinnipiac University · USUniversity of Massachusetts Chan Medical School · US

Funding

REPRESSIVE HISTONE AND DNA METHYLATION IN RODENT DEPRESSION MODELSP50MH096890 · NIMH · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI TAMMINGA, CAROL A · 2012 to 2021
$20.2M
Cell Death and Neural Sex DifferencesR01MH068482 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS AMHERST · PI FORGER, NANCY G · 2004 to 2013
$2.9M
Remodeling Neuronal Chromatin in Mouse Models for DepressionR01MH086509 · NIMH · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI AKBARIAN, SCHAHRAM · 2010 to 2014
$2.0M
NIMH NIH HHS P50 MH096890NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH068482NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH086509NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH 086509-01A1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many neurological and psychiatric disorders exhibit gender disparities, and sex differences in the brain likely explain some of these effects. Recent work in rodents points to a role for epigenetics in the development or maintenance of neural sex differences, although genome-wide studies have so far been lacking. Here we review the existing literature on epigenetics and brain sexual differentiation and present preliminary analyses on the genome-wide distribution of histone-3 lysine-4 trimethylation in a sexually dimorphic brain region in male and female mice. H3K4me3 is a histone mark primarily organized as 'peaks' surrounding the transcription start site of active genes. We microdissected the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis and preoptic area (BNST/POA) in adult male and female mice and used ChIP-Seq to compare the distribution of H3K4me3 throughout the genome. We found 248 genes and loci with a significant sex difference in H3K4me3. Of these, the majority (71%) had larger H3K4me3 peaks in females. Comparisons with existing databases indicate that genes and loci with increased H3K4me3 in females are associated with synaptic function and with expression atlases from related brain areas. Based on RT-PCR, only a minority of genes with a sex difference in H3K4me3 has detectable sex differences in expression at baseline conditions. Together with previous findings, our data suggest that there may be sex biases in the use of epigenetic marks. Such biases could underlie sex differences in vulnerabilities to drugs or diseases that disrupt specific epigenetic processes.

Indexed as

EpigenomicsSex CharacteristicsAnimalsBrainFemaleHistonesLysineMaleMiceHistonesLysineBed nucleus of the stria terminalisChIP-SeqHistoneMethylationPreoptic areaSex difference

Identifiers

PMID25131640
PMCPMC4329105
OpenAlexW1989634062

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.