Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25131620›Full record

ArticleDiabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association2015

Pilot study to assess measures to be used in the prospective audit of the management of foot ulcers in people with diabetes.

N Holman, B Young, H Stephens, W Jeffcoate, Members of the National Foot Care Audit Steering Group

Abstract readMulticenter StudyValidation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Audit of diabetic foot care services--a timely initiative.Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

N HolmanNational Cardiovascular Intelligence Network, Public Health England, York, UK; Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
B Young
H Stephens
W Jeffcoate
Members of the National Foot Care Audit Steering Group
Diabetes UK · GBNottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust · GBPublic Health England · GBUniversity of Glasgow · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo design and test a methodology for assessing aspects of the management of foot disease in diabetes.

methodsA national working group devised pilot datasets that may be used to document the process of management of active ulceration. Participating volunteer specialist units throughout England were required to characterize newly presenting people with diabetic foot ulcers using a standard questionnaire comprising the dataset and to document outcomes at 6 and 12 months. Semi-structured interviews were later conducted with the volunteers at the units.

resultsA total of 23 units recorded baseline data on 652 people with incident foot ulcers; valid outcome data were available for 541 people (83.0%). Of the 541 index ulcers, 351 (64.9%) healed within 24 weeks, with a median time to healing of 63 days. Ulcer site and depth and peripheral arterial disease were associated with differing ulcer healing rates. By contrast, baseline demographic characteristics were not independently associated with healing. These were used to calculate a standardized case-mix adjusted healing ratio. In most units data collection took < 10 min per person, but participants reported that the burden of local data collection was still excessive.

conclusionThis study confirmed the feasibility of routine multi-unit comparative assessment of care of the foot in diabetes, including the generation of meaningful service reports, but for general use the burden of local data collection will need to be reduced (e.g. by using linkage to existing national data collections).

Indexed as

Clinical AuditQuality of LifeWound HealingAgedData CollectionDiabetic FootEnglandFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOutcome Assessment, Health CarePilot ProjectsPractice Guidelines as TopicProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID25131620
OpenAlexW2056699912

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.