Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25131204›Full record

ArticleCell reports2014

Evidence against a stem cell origin of new hepatocytes in a common mouse model of chronic liver injury.

Johanna R Schaub, Yann Malato, Coralie Gormond, Holger Willenbring

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell reports, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 150 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
150citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

150 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Influencing factors and mechanism of hepatocyte regeneration.Journal of translational medicine · 2025
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. GPNMBThe EMBO journal · 2023
    Article
  15. Fetal liver development and implications for liver disease pathogenesis.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2023
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Significance of CCNs in liver regeneration.Journal of cell communication and signaling · 2023
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

90 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Johanna R SchaubEli and Edythe Broad Center of Regeneration Medicine and Stem Cell Research, University of California, San Francisco, 35 Medical Center Way, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA.
Yann MalatoEli and Edythe Broad Center of Regeneration Medicine and Stem Cell Research, University of California, San Francisco, 35 Medical Center Way, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA.
Coralie GormondEli and Edythe Broad Center of Regeneration Medicine and Stem Cell Research, University of California, San Francisco, 35 Medical Center Way, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA.
Holger WillenbringEli and Edythe Broad Center of Regeneration Medicine and Stem Cell Research, University of California, San Francisco, 35 Medical Center Way, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA; Department of Surgery, Division of Transplantation, University of California, San Francisco, 505 Parnassus Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA; Liver Center, University of California, San Francisco, 1001 Potrero Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94110, USA. Electronic address: willenbringh@stemcell.ucsf.edu.

Funding

UCSF Liver Core CenterP30DK026743 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI Holger Willenbring · 1986 to 2026
$30.7M
NRSA Hepatology Training GrantT32DK060414 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI Mandana Khalili, JACQUELYN J. MAHER · 2002 to 2026
$6.8M
NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK026743NIDDK NIH HHS P30DK26743NIDDK NIH HHS T32 DK060414
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hepatocytes provide most liver functions, but they can also proliferate and regenerate the liver after injury. However, under some liver injury conditions, particularly chronic liver injury where hepatocyte proliferation is impaired, liver stem cells (LSCs) are thought to replenish lost hepatocytes. Conflicting results have been reported about the identity of LSCs and their contribution to liver regeneration. To address this uncertainty, we followed candidate LSC populations by genetic fate tracing in adult mice with chronic liver injury due to a choline-deficient, ethionine-supplemented diet. In contrast to previous studies, we failed to detect hepatocytes derived from biliary epithelial cells or mesenchymal liver cells beyond a negligible frequency. In fact, we failed to detect hepatocytes that were not derived from pre-existing hepatocytes. In conclusion, our findings argue against LSCs, or other nonhepatocyte cell types, providing a backup system for hepatocyte regeneration in this common mouse model of chronic liver injury.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell LineageChemical and Drug Induced Liver Injury, ChronicHepatocytesLiverLiver RegenerationMesenchymal Stem CellsMice, Transgenic

Identifiers

PMID25131204
PMCPMC4376310

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.