ArticleJournal of veterinary pharmacology and therapeutics2014
Pharmacokinetics of oral chlortetracycline in nonpregnant adult ewes.
Article in Journal of veterinary pharmacology and therapeutics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pharmacokinetics of tulathromycin in pregnant ewes (Ovis aries) challenged with Campylobacter jejuni.PloS one · 2021Article
- Management of Coxiella burnetii infection in livestock populations and the associated zoonotic risk: A consensus statement.Journal of veterinary internal medicine · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The objectives of this study were to determine plasma concentrations and pharmacokinetic parameters of feed-grade chlortetracycline (CTC) in sheep after oral administration of 80 or 500 mg/head daily, divided into two equal doses given at 12-h intervals for 8 days. These are the approved, and commonly used but unapproved, feed additive doses, respectively, in the United States for the prevention of ovine infectious abortion. Blood samples were collected just prior to dosing at 0, 12, 24, 72, 96, and 192 h, as well as 4, 8, 12, 24, and 36 h after the last dose, and noncompartmental pharmacokinetic analysis was performed to estimate elimination half-life and area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC). Mean observed maximum CTC concentrations (Cmax ) were 20.0 ng/mL (80 mg dose) and 101 ng/mL (500 mg dose). Mean apparent elimination half-life was 18 h (80 mg dose) and 20 h (500 mg dose). Although published data do not exist to estimate plasma CTC concentrations necessary for the prevention of ovine infectious abortion, concentrations reached in our study suggest that either the FDA-approved and FDA-unapproved dosages are not high enough or that the pharmacodynamic parameter relating preventive dose to pathogen minimum inhibitory concentrations is yet to be determined.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.