Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25130518›Full record

Trial reportGeneral hospital psychiatry

Cost effectiveness of telecare management for pain and depression in patients with cancer: results from a randomized trial.

Sung J Choi Yoo, John A Nyman, Andrea L Cheville, Kurt Kroenke

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in General hospital psychiatry. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. The role of digital health technology in rural cancer care delivery: A systematic review.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. The Cost-Effectiveness of Mobile Health (mHealth) Interventions for Older Adults: Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. "Everything cannot be handled virtually": Understanding intention and use of digital health technologies among rural adults and rural cancer survivors.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2025
    Article
  9. Integrating Fitness Training in Oncologic Care: Lessons Learned from a Large Telemedicine Trial.Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Telepsychiatry and Outpatient Department Services.Indian journal of psychological medicine · 2020
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sung J Choi YooDivision of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.
John A NymanDivision of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.
Andrea L ChevilleDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Mayo Clinic.
Kurt KroenkeVA HSR&D Center for Health Information and Communication, Regenstrief Institute, Inc., and Indiana University School of Medicine. Electronic address: kkroenke@regenstrief.org.

Funding

TeleCare Management of Pain and Depression in CancerR01CA115369 · NCI · INDIANA UNIV-PURDUE UNIV AT INDIANAPOLIS · PI KROENKE, KURT · 2005 to 2009
$2.1M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA-115369NCI NIH HHS R01 CA115369
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivePain and depression are prevalent and treatable symptoms among patients with cancer, yet they are often undetected and undertreated. The Indiana Cancer Pain and Depression (INCPAD) trial demonstrated that telecare management can improve pain and depression outcomes. This article investigates the incremental cost effectiveness of the INCPAD intervention.

methodsThe INCPAD trial was conducted in 16 community-based urban and rural oncology practices in Indiana. Of the 405 participants, 202 were randomized to the intervention group and 203 to the usual-care group. Intervention costs were determined, and effectiveness outcomes were depression-free days and quality-adjusted life years.

resultsThe intervention group was associated with a yearly increase of 60.3 depression-free days (S.E. = 15.4; P < 0.01) and an increase of between 0.033 and 0.066 quality-adjusted life years compared to the usual care group. Total cost of the intervention per patient was US$1189, which included physician, nurse care manager and automated monitoring set-up and maintenance costs. Incremental cost per depression-free day was US$19.72, which yields a range of US$18,018 to US$36,035 per quality-adjusted life year when converted to that metric. When measured directly, the incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year ranged from US$10,826 based on the modified EQ-5D to US$73,286.92 based on the SF-12.

conclusionCentralized telecare management, coupled with automated symptom monitoring, appears to be a cost effective intervention for managing pain and depression in cancer patients.

Indexed as

Health Care CostsCost-Benefit AnalysisDepressive DisorderFemaleHumansIndianaMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsPainPain ManagementQuality-Adjusted Life YearsTelemedicineTreatment OutcomeCancerCost-effectivenessDepressionPainTelecare

Identifiers

PMID25130518
PMCPMC4252770

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.