Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25130503›Full record

Trial reportAllergy2014

A high polymerized grass pollen extract is efficacious and safe in a randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled study using a novel up-dosing cluster-protocol.

L Klimek, J Uhlig, R Mösges, K Rettig, O Pfaar

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Allergy, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04874714 phase3terminatednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Prospective, Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Multi-center Trial Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Subcutaneous Immunotherapy With a Mixture of Grasses and Mites at Adequate Doses Versus Monotherapy, for the Treatment of Allergy

TypeinterventionalSponsorInmunotek S.L.Ran2021 to 2023Enrolled18ConditionsAllergic Rhinoconjunctivitis, Perennial Allergic Rhinitis, House Dust Mite Allergy, Pollen AllergyArmsMM09-MG01(30.000-30.000), MG01(30.000), MM09(30.000), Placebo subcutaneous
NCT04891237 phase3recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

A Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled, Prospective, Multicenter CT to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of Subcutaneous Immunotherapy in Subjects With Rhinitis With/Without Mild to Moderate Asthma Sensitized to Olive and Grass Pollen

TypeinterventionalSponsorInmunotek S.L.Ran2021 to 2027Enrolled180ConditionsRhinitis, Allergic, Rhinoconjunctivitis, Asthma, AllergicArms10,000 MG01 + 10,000 T517, 30,000 MG01 + 10,000 T517, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Adjuvants for allergy immunotherapeutics.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2017
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Familial Success in Allergen Desensitization.Allergy & rhinology (Providence, R.I.)
    Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

L KlimekCenter for Rhinology and Allergology, Wiesbaden, Germany.
J Uhlig
R Mösges
K Rettig
O Pfaar
Zentrum für Rhinologie und Allergologie · DEGerman Agency for Quality in Medicine · DEInstitute of Energy Economics at the University of Cologne · DERoxall (Germany) · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCluster immunotherapy represents an interesting alternative to conventional up-dosing schedules because it allows achieving the maintenance dose within a shorter time interval. In this study, the efficacy and safety of cluster immunotherapy with a high polymerized allergen extract of a grass/rye pollen mixture have been evaluated in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study.

methodsIn total, 121 patients with allergic rhinoconjunctivitis due to grass pollen were randomized 1 : 1 to verum or placebo group. A short cluster up-dosing schedule of only 1 week was applied to achieve the maintenance dose which was administered monthly during the study period of 1 year. Total combined symptom and medication score (TCS) was defined as primary outcome parameter. Secondary outcome parameters were individual symptom and medication scores, 'well days,' global improvement as well as immunological effects and nasal allergen challenge. The safety profile was evaluated based on the European academy of allergy and clinical immunology grading system.

resultsSignificant reduction in the verum compared to the placebo group (intention-to-treat, population, verum: n = 55; placebo: n = 47) was found regarding TCS (P = 0.005), rhinoconjunctivitis total symptom score (RTSS, P = 0.006), and total rescue medication score (TRMS, P = 0.002). Additionally, secondary outcomes such as 'well days,' nasal challenge results, and increase of specific IgG4 were in favor of the active treatment. All systemic adverse reactions (0.8% of all injections in the verum group) were of mild intensity. No severe reactions related to the study medication were observed.

conclusionCluster immunotherapy with high polymerized grass pollen extracts resulted in significant clinical efficacy and has been shown to be a safe treatment for grass pollen-allergic patients.

Indexed as

Desensitization, ImmunologicAdolescentAdultAgedAllergensConjunctivitis, AllergicFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPlant ExtractsPoaceaePollenRisk FactorsTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultAllergensPlant Extractsallergic rhinoconjunctivitiscluster immunotherapyglutardialdehyde-polymerized allergen extractgrass pollenspecific subcutaneous immunotherapy

Identifiers

PMID25130503
PMCPMC4238814
OpenAlexW2023202239

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.