Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25130492›Full record

ArticleCell stem cell2014

Adult hepatocytes are generated by self-duplication rather than stem cell differentiation.

Kilangsungla Yanger, David Knigin, Yiwei Zong, Lara Maggs, Guoqiang Gu, Haruhiko Akiyama, Eli Pikarsky, Ben Z Stanger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell stem cell, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 240 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
240citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

240 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Signal control during tissue regeneration in adult animals.Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Conversion of Transplanted Mature Hepatocytes into AfpAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Liver macrophages: development, dynamics, and functions.Cellular & molecular immunology · 2025
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

180 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Kilangsungla YangerDepartment of Medicine, Gastroenterology Division, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Abramson Family Cancer Research Institute, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
David KniginDepartment of Immunology and Cancer Research and Department of Pathology, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem 91120, Israel; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem 91120, Israel.
Yiwei ZongDepartment of Medicine, Gastroenterology Division, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Abramson Family Cancer Research Institute, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Lara MaggsDepartment of Medicine, Gastroenterology Division, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Abramson Family Cancer Research Institute, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Guoqiang GuDepartment of Cell and Developmental Biology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37212, USA.
Haruhiko AkiyamaDepartment of Orthopedics, Gifu University, Gifu City 501-1194, Japan.
Eli PikarskyDepartment of Immunology and Cancer Research and Department of Pathology, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem 91120, Israel.
Ben Z StangerDepartment of Medicine, Gastroenterology Division, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Abramson Family Cancer Research Institute, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA. Electronic address: bstanger@exchange.upenn.edu.

Funding

TRANSGENIC AND CHIMERIC MOUSE COREP30DK050306 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI REBECCA G WELLS · 1997 to 2026
$32.5M
Vanderbilt Diabetes Research CenterP30DK020593 · NIDDK · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI ALVIN C POWERS · 2012 to 2026
$29.3M
The Mechanisms of Islet Cell Specification and DifferentiationR01DK065949 · NIDDK · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI GU, GUOQIANG · 2004 to 2017
$4.4M
Mechanisms of bile duct reprogrammingR01DK083355 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI GROMPE, MARKUS, STANGER, BEN Z · 2009 to 2020
$4.3M
NIDDK NIH HHS DK083355NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK020593NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK050306NIDDK NIH HHS P30DK050306NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK065949NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK083355
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The liver is thought to utilize facultative stem cells, also known as "oval cells" or "atypical ductal cells" (ADCs), for regeneration following various types of injury. However, this notion has been based largely on in vitro studies and transplantation models; where lineage tracing has been used, results have been conflicting and effect sizes have been small. Here, we used genetic and nucleoside analog-based tools to mark and track the origin and contribution of various cell populations to liver regeneration in vivo following several ADC-inducing insults. We report that, contrary to prevailing stem-cell-based models of regeneration, virtually all new hepatocytes come from preexisting hepatocytes.

Indexed as

Cell DifferentiationAdultAnimalsBiliary TractCell ProliferationDependovirusEpithelial CellsHepatocytesHumansMaleMice, Inbred C57BLStem Cells

Identifiers

PMID25130492
PMCPMC4505916

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.