Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25130052›Full record

Trial reportAddiction biology2016

Pharmacodynamic effects of oral oxymorphone: abuse liability, analgesic profile and direct physiologic effects in humans.

Shanna Babalonis, Michelle R Lofwall, Paul A Nuzzo, Sharon L Walsh

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Addiction biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Association ofAnnals of translational medicine · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. PharmGKB summary: oxycodone pathway, pharmacokinetics.Pharmacogenetics and genomics · 2018
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Shanna BabalonisCollege of Medicine, Department of Behavioral Science, University of Kentucky, Lexington, USA.
Michelle R LofwallCollege of Medicine, Department of Behavioral Science, University of Kentucky, Lexington, USA.
Paul A NuzzoCenter on Drug and Alcohol Research, University of Kentucky, Lexington, USA.
Sharon L WalshCollege of Medicine, Department of Behavioral Science, University of Kentucky, Lexington, USA.
University of Kentucky · US

Funding

Kentucky Center for Clinical and Translational ScienceUL1TR000117 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI KERN, PHILIP A · 2012 to 2015
$13.3M
Licit &Illicit Opioids: Comparative Studies in HumansR01DA016718 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI WALSH, SHARON L. · 2004 to 2023
$8.6M
KENTUCKY CENTER FOR CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCEUL1RR033173 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI KERN, PHILIP A · 2011 to 2011
$3.5M
RESEARCH TRAINING IN DRUG ABUSE BEHAVIORT32DA007304 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI RUSH, CRAIG R · 1998 to 2012
$3.1M
Kentucky Center for Clinical and Translational ScienceKL2TR000116 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI KERN, PHILIP A · 2012 to 2015
$1.9M
Kentucky Center for Clinical and Translational ScienceKL2RR033171 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI KERN, PHILIP A · 2011 to 2011
$302k
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR000116NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000117NCRR NIH HHS KL2 RR033171NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR033173NCRR NIH HHS UL1RR033173NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA016718NIDA NIH HHS R01DA016718NIDA NIH HHS T32 DA007304
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Oxymorphone is a semisynthetic μ-opioid agonist, marketed as a prescription analgesic purported to be twice as potent as oxycodone for pain relief. Oral formulations of oxymorphone were reintroduced in the United States in 2006 and reports of abuse ensued; however, there are limited data available on its pharmacodynamic effects. The current study aimed to examine the direct physiologic effects, relative abuse liability, analgesic profile and overall pharmacodynamic potency of oxymorphone in comparison with identical doses of oxycodone. Healthy, non-dependent opioid abusers (n = 9) were enrolled in this within-subject, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 3-week inpatient study. Seven experimental sessions (6.5 hours) were conducted, during which an oral dose of immediate-release formulations of oxymorphone (10, 20 and 40 mg), oxycodone (10, 20 and 40 mg) or placebo was administered. An array of physiologic, abuse liability and experimental pain measures was collected. At identical doses, oxymorphone produced approximately twofold less potent effects on miosis, compared with oxycodone. Oxymorphone also produced lesser magnitude effects on measures of respiratory depression, two experimental pain models and observer-rated agonist effects. However, 40 mg of oxymorphone was similar to 40 mg of oxycodone on several abuse-related subjective ratings. Formal relative potency analyses were largely invalid because of the substantially greater effects of oxycodone. Overall, oxymorphone is less potent on most pharmacodynamic measures, although at higher doses, its abuse liability is similar to oxycodone. These data suggest that the published clinical equianalgesic estimates may not be consistent with the observed direct physiologic effects of opioids, results of experimental pain models or abuse liability measures, as assessed in the human laboratory.

Indexed as

Opioid-Related DisordersAdministration, OralAdultAnalgesics, OpioidBlood PressureCognitionCold TemperatureCross-Over StudiesDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHeart RateHumansMaleOxymorphonePainPain MeasurementAnalgesics, OpioidOxymorphoneAbuse liabilitycold pressorexperimental pain modelsoxycodoneoxymorphonepressure algometer

Identifiers

PMID25130052
PMCPMC4383736
OpenAlexW2058485180

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.