Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25129329›Full record

ArticleContraception2014

Unmet demand for highly effective postpartum contraception in Texas.

Joseph E Potter, Kristine Hopkins, Abigail R A Aiken, Celia Hubert, Amanda J Stevenson, Kari White, Daniel Grossman

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Contraception, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Contraceptive access and infant health outcomes.Journal of health economics · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Fertility Desires and Contraceptive Transition.Population and development review · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Joseph E PotterPopulation Research Center, University of Texas at Austin, TX, USA. Electronic address: joe@prc.utexas.edu.
Kristine HopkinsPopulation Research Center, University of Texas at Austin, TX, USA.
Abigail R A AikenPopulation Research Center, University of Texas at Austin, TX, USA; LBJ School of Public Affairs, University of Texas at Austin, TX, USA.
Celia HubertPopulation Research Center, University of Texas at Austin, TX, USA.
Amanda J StevensonPopulation Research Center, University of Texas at Austin, TX, USA.
Kari WhiteHealth Care Organization and Policy, University of Alabama at Birmingham, AL, USA.
Daniel GrossmanIbis Reproductive Health, Oakland, CA, USA; Bixby Center for Global Reproductive Health, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.

Funding

Population Research CenterR24HD042849 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AUSTIN · PI HAYWARD, MARK D. · 2002 to 2016
$8.4M
Infrastructure for Population Research at PrincetonR24HD047879 · NICHD · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI MASSEY, DOUGLAS S · 2004 to 2013
$7.3M
Training Program in Population StudiesT32HD007081 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AUSTIN · PI Aprile Dawn Benner, Abigail Mae Weitzman · 1985 to 2026
$6.8M
Demographic Diversity in the Measurement and Meaning of Unintended PregnancyF31HD079182 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI AIKEN, ABIGAIL ROSEMARY ANNE · 2014 to 2014
$31k
NICHD NIH HHS 5 R24 HD042849NICHD NIH HHS F31 HD079182NICHD NIH HHS R24 HD042849NICHD NIH HHS R24 HD047879NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD007081
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesWe aimed to assess women's contraceptive preferences and use in the first 6 months after delivery. The postpartum period represents a key opportunity for women to learn about and obtain effective contraception, especially since 50% of unintended pregnancies to parous women occur within 2 years of a previous birth.

methodsWe conducted a prospective cohort study of 800 postpartum women recruited from three hospitals in Austin and El Paso, TX. Women aged 18-44 who wanted to delay childbearing for at least 24 months were eligible for the study and completed interviews following delivery and at 3 and 6 months postpartum. Participants were asked about the contraceptive method they were currently using and the method they would prefer to use at 6 months after delivery.

resultsAt 6 months postpartum, 13% of women were using an intrauterine device or implant, and 17% were sterilized or had a partner who had had a vasectomy. Twenty-four percent were using hormonal methods, and 45% relied on less effective methods, mainly condoms and withdrawal. Yet 44% reported that they would prefer to be using sterilization, and 34% would prefer to be using long-acting reversible contraception (LARC).

conclusionsThis study shows a considerable preference for LARC and permanent methods at 6 months postpartum. However, there is a marked discordance between women's method preference and actual use, indicating substantial unmet demand for highly effective methods of contraception. IMPLICATIONS: In two Texas cities, many more women preferred long-acting and permanent contraceptive methods (LAPM) than were able to access these methods at 6 months postpartum. Women's contraceptive needs could be better met by counseling about all methods, by reducing cost barriers and by making LAPM available at more sites.

Indexed as

Postpartum PeriodAdolescentAdultContraceptionContraception BehaviorFemaleHumansMalePatient PreferenceProspective StudiesTexasYoung AdultFemale sterilizationHispanicLARCPostpartum contraceptionTexas

Identifiers

PMID25129329
PMCPMC4207725

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.