ArticleContraception2014
Unmet demand for highly effective postpartum contraception in Texas.
Article in Contraception, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
52 citing papers in PubMed.
- Latina Immigrants' Experiences Accessing Contraceptive Services Beyond the Postpartum Period and the Role of Community and Pediatric Settings.Qualitative health research · 2026Article
- Contraceptive access and infant health outcomes.Journal of health economics · 2025Article
- Meeting Contraceptive Preferences Among Low-Income Postpartum Texans: A Counterfactual Analysis of Pregnancy Trajectories.Studies in family planning · 2025Article
- Australian GPs' experiences, practices, and perspectives on postpartum care, contraception, and breastfeeding.Family practice · 2025Article
- Barriers and facilitators to contraception provision among rural healthcare providers.Contraception and reproductive medicine · 2025Article
- Fertility Desires and Contraceptive Transition.Population and development review · 2024Article
- Changes in contraceptive method mix following the Colorado Family Planning Initiative.Contraception · 2024Article
- Postpartum long-acting reversible contraceptive adoption after a statewide initiative.Health services research · 2024Article
- Use of preferred contraceptive method among young adults in Texas and California: A comparison by state and insurance coverage.PloS one · 2023Article
- Review of Publicly Available State Policies for Long-Acting Reversible Contraception Device Reimbursement.Journal of women's health (2002) · 2022Article
- Mi Familia Entera: Contraceptive Use Among Spanish-Speaking Mothers of Young Children.Maternal and child health journal · 2022Article
- Associations between unfulfilled contraceptive preferences due to cost and low-income patients' access to and experiences of contraceptive care in the United States, 2015-2019.Contraception: X · 2022Article
- The impact of contraceptive access on high school graduation.Science advances · 2021Article
- Use of nonpreferred contraceptive methods among women in Ohio.Contraception · 2021Article
- Contraindications to Hormonal Contraception Among Postpartum Women in Texas.Obstetrics and gynecology · 2021Article
- Short-acting hormonal contraceptive continuation among low-income postpartum women in Texas.Contraception: X · 2021Article
- Article
- The Dynamics of Intimate Relationships and Contraceptive Use During Early Emerging Adulthood.Demography · 2020Article
- Breastfeeding Initiation, Duration, and Supplementation Among Mexican-Origin Women in Texas.Pediatrics · 2020Article
- Unsatisfied contraceptive preferences due to cost among women in the United States.Contraception: X · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesWe aimed to assess women's contraceptive preferences and use in the first 6 months after delivery. The postpartum period represents a key opportunity for women to learn about and obtain effective contraception, especially since 50% of unintended pregnancies to parous women occur within 2 years of a previous birth.
methodsWe conducted a prospective cohort study of 800 postpartum women recruited from three hospitals in Austin and El Paso, TX. Women aged 18-44 who wanted to delay childbearing for at least 24 months were eligible for the study and completed interviews following delivery and at 3 and 6 months postpartum. Participants were asked about the contraceptive method they were currently using and the method they would prefer to use at 6 months after delivery.
resultsAt 6 months postpartum, 13% of women were using an intrauterine device or implant, and 17% were sterilized or had a partner who had had a vasectomy. Twenty-four percent were using hormonal methods, and 45% relied on less effective methods, mainly condoms and withdrawal. Yet 44% reported that they would prefer to be using sterilization, and 34% would prefer to be using long-acting reversible contraception (LARC).
conclusionsThis study shows a considerable preference for LARC and permanent methods at 6 months postpartum. However, there is a marked discordance between women's method preference and actual use, indicating substantial unmet demand for highly effective methods of contraception. IMPLICATIONS: In two Texas cities, many more women preferred long-acting and permanent contraceptive methods (LAPM) than were able to access these methods at 6 months postpartum. Women's contraceptive needs could be better met by counseling about all methods, by reducing cost barriers and by making LAPM available at more sites.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.