Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25128444›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of obstetrics and gynecology2015

Impact of prolapse meshes on the metabolism of vaginal extracellular matrix in rhesus macaque.

Rui Liang, Wenjun Zong, Stacy Palcsey, Steven Abramowitch, Pamela A Moalli

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy mesh excision step-by-step.International urogynecology journal · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rui LiangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Magee-Womens Research Institute, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.
Wenjun ZongDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Magee-Womens Research Institute, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.
Stacy PalcseyDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Magee-Womens Research Institute, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.
Steven AbramowitchDepartment of Bioengineering, Swanson School of Engineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.
Pamela A MoalliDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Magee-Womens Research Institute, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA. Electronic address: moalpa@mail.magee.edu.
Magee-Womens Research Institute · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

Comprehensive Evaluation of Prolapse Meshes by an Interdisciplinary Research TeamR01HD061811 · NICHD · MAGEE-WOMEN'S RES INST AND FOUNDATION · PI MOALLI, PAMELA A. · 2009 to 2013
$2.1M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD061811NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD061811-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe impact of polypropylene mesh implantation on vaginal collagen and elastin metabolism was analyzed using a nonhuman primate model to further delineate the mechanism of mesh induced complications. STUDY

designForty-nine middle-aged parous rhesus macaques underwent surgical implantation of 3 synthetic meshes via sacrocolpopexy. Gynemesh PS (n = 12) (Ethicon, Somerville, NJ) and 2 lower-weight, higher-porosity, lower-stiffness meshes (UltraPro [n = 19] [Ethicon] and Restorelle [n = 8] [Coloplast, Minneapolis, MN]) were implanted, in which UltraPro was implanted with its blue orientation lines perpendicular (low stiffness direction, n = 11) and parallel (high stiffness direction, n = 8) to the longitudinal axis of the vagina. Sham-operated animals were used as controls (n = 10). Twelve weeks after surgery, the mesh-tissue complex was excised and analyzed.

resultsRelative to sham, Gynemesh PS had a negative impact on the metabolism of both collagen and elastin-favoring catabolic reactions, whereas UltraPro induced an increase only in elastin degradation. Restorelle had the least impact. As compared with sham, the degradation of collagen and elastin in the vagina implanted with Gynemesh PS was increased with a simultaneous increase in active matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-1, -8, -13, and total MMP-2 and -9 (all P < .05). The degradation of elastin (tropoelastin and mature elastin) was increased in the UltraPro-implanted vagina with a concomitant increase of MMP-2, and -9 (all P < .05). Collagen subtype ratio III/I was increased in Gynemesh PS and UltraPro perpendicular groups (P < .05).

conclusionFollowing implantation with the heavier, less porous, and stiffer mesh, Gynemesh PS, the degradation of vaginal collagen and elastin exceeded synthesis, most likely as a result of increased activity of MMPs, resulting in a structurally compromised tissue.

Indexed as

PolypropylenesAnimalsBlotting, WesternCollagenCollagen Type ICollagen Type IIIElastinElectrophoresis, Polyacrylamide GelExtracellular MatrixFemaleMacaca mulattaMatrix Metalloproteinase 1Matrix Metalloproteinase 13Matrix Metalloproteinase 2Matrix Metalloproteinase 8Matrix Metalloproteinase 9CollagenCollagen Type ICollagen Type IIIElastinMatrix Metalloproteinase 1Matrix Metalloproteinase 13Matrix Metalloproteinase 2Matrix Metalloproteinase 8Matrix Metalloproteinase 9PolypropylenesProcollagenTropoelastincollagen and elastinmatrix metalloproteinasesrhesus macaquesynthetic meshvagina

Identifiers

PMID25128444
PMCPMC4312539
OpenAlexW2070124243

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.