Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25128347›Full record

ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2014

Enhanced uranium immobilization and reduction by Geobacter sulfurreducens biofilms.

Dena L Cologgi, Allison M Speers, Blair A Bullard, Shelly D Kelly, Gemma Reguera

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 88 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. The role ofSustainable microbiology · 2026
    Review
  3. ACS omega · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Methylmercury formation in biofilms ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2023
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Application Progress ofIndian journal of microbiology · 2021
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Genetic analysis of electroactive biofilms.International microbiology : the official journal of the Spanish Society for Microbiology · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Biofilm Biology and Engineering ofFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2021
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Biology and biotechnology of microbial pilus nanowires.Journal of industrial microbiology & biotechnology · 2020
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Harnessing the power of microbial nanowires.Microbial biotechnology · 2018
    Review
  20. Biogenic non-crystalline UNature communications · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Dena L CologgiDepartment of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA.
Allison M SpeersDepartment of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA.
Blair A BullardDepartment of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA.
Shelly D KellyEXAFS Analysis, Bolingbrook, Illinois, USA.
Gemma RegueraDepartment of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA reguera@msu.edu.
Michigan State University · US

Funding

Novel Mechanism of Uranium Reduction Via Microbial NanowiresR01ES017052 · NIEHS · MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY · PI REGUERA, GEMMA · 2009 to 2011
$887k
NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES017052NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES017052-03
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biofilms formed by dissimilatory metal reducers are of interest to develop permeable biobarriers for the immobilization of soluble contaminants such as uranium. Here we show that biofilms of the model uranium-reducing bacterium Geobacter sulfurreducens immobilized substantially more U(VI) than planktonic cells and did so for longer periods of time, reductively precipitating it to a mononuclear U(IV) phase involving carbon ligands. The biofilms also tolerated high and otherwise toxic concentrations (up to 5 mM) of uranium, consistent with a respiratory strategy that also protected the cells from uranium toxicity. The enhanced ability of the biofilms to immobilize uranium correlated only partially with the biofilm biomass and thickness and depended greatly on the area of the biofilm exposed to the soluble contaminant. In contrast, uranium reduction depended on the expression of Geobacter conductive pili and, to a lesser extent, on the presence of the c cytochrome OmcZ in the biofilm matrix. The results support a model in which the electroactive biofilm matrix immobilizes and reduces the uranium in the top stratum. This mechanism prevents the permeation and mineralization of uranium in the cell envelope, thereby preserving essential cellular functions and enhancing the catalytic capacity of Geobacter cells to reduce uranium. Hence, the biofilms provide cells with a physically and chemically protected environment for the sustained immobilization and reduction of uranium that is of interest for the development of improved strategies for the in situ bioremediation of environments impacted by uranium contamination.

Indexed as

BiofilmsCarbonCytochromes cFimbriae, BacterialGeobacterOxidation-ReductionUraniumCarbonCytochromes cUranium

Identifiers

PMID25128347
PMCPMC4249037
OpenAlexW2160662164

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.