Trial reportJournal of neuroscience methods2014
Non-causal spike filtering improves decoding of movement intention for intracortical BCIs.
Trial report in Journal of neuroscience methods, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00912041 (BrainGate2), which is not on this map. Cited by 23 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
BrainGate2: Feasibility Study of an Intracortical Neural Interface System for Persons With Tetraplegia
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed.
- Speech-related dorsal motor cortex activity does not interfere with iBCI cursor control.Journal of neural engineering · 2020Trial
- Restoring rapid natural bimanual typing with a neuroprosthesis after paralysis.Nature neuroscience · 2026Article
- Learning-related population dynamics in right and left dorsal premotor cortex during typing skill acquisition.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Premotor cortex uses a compositional neural geometry to plan words.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Review of Recent Advances in Implantable Brain-Computer Interfaces for the Restoration of Motor Function in Patients With Paralysis.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2026Review
- Article
- Enhanced control of a brain-computer interface by tetraplegic participants via neural-network-mediated feature extraction.Nature biomedical engineering · 2025Article
- Measuring instability in chronic human intracortical neural recordings towards stable, long-term brain-computer interfaces.Communications biology · 2024Article
- Utah array characterization and histological analysis of a multi-year implant in non-human primate motor and sensory cortices.Journal of neural engineering · 2023Article
- The science and engineering behind sensitized brain-controlled bionic hands.Physiological reviews · 2022Review
- Home Use of a Percutaneous Wireless Intracortical Brain-Computer Interface by Individuals With Tetraplegia.IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering · 2021Article
- Auditory cues reveal intended movement information in middle frontal gyrus neuronal ensemble activity of a person with tetraplegia.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Replay of Learned Neural Firing Sequences during Rest in Human Motor Cortex.Cell reports · 2020Article
- A neural network for online spike classification that improves decoding accuracy.Journal of neurophysiology · 2020Article
- Classifying Intracortical Brain-Machine Interface Signal Disruptions Based on System Performance and Applicable Compensatory Strategies: A Review.Frontiers in neurorobotics · 2020Review
- Article
- Brain-machine interface cursor position only weakly affects monkey and human motor cortical activity in the absence of arm movements.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- Characterisation and functional mapping of surface potentials in the rat dorsal column nuclei.The Journal of physiology · 2017Article
- Retrospectively supervised click decoder calibration for self-calibrating point-and-click brain-computer interfaces.Journal of physiology, Paris · 2016Article
- Virtual typing by people with tetraplegia using a self-calibrating intracortical brain-computer interface.Science translational medicine · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
- Reprinted as
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMultiple types of neural signals are available for controlling assistive devices through brain-computer interfaces (BCIs). Intracortically recorded spiking neural signals are attractive for BCIs because they can in principle provide greater fidelity of encoded information compared to electrocorticographic (ECoG) signals and electroencephalograms (EEGs). Recent reports show that the information content of these spiking neural signals can be reliably extracted simply by causally band-pass filtering the recorded extracellular voltage signals and then applying a spike detection threshold, without relying on "sorting" action potentials. NEW
methodWe show that replacing the causal filter with an equivalent non-causal filter increases the information content extracted from the extracellular spiking signal and improves decoding of intended movement direction. This method can be used for real-time BCI applications by using a 4ms lag between recording and filtering neural signals.
resultsAcross 18 sessions from two people with tetraplegia enrolled in the BrainGate2 pilot clinical trial, we found that threshold crossing events extracted using this non-causal filtering method were significantly more informative of each participant's intended cursor kinematics compared to threshold crossing events derived from causally filtered signals. This new method decreased the mean angular error between the intended and decoded cursor direction by 9.7° for participant S3, who was implanted 5.4 years prior to this study, and by 3.5° for participant T2, who was implanted 3 months prior to this study.
conclusionsNon-causally filtering neural signals prior to extracting threshold crossing events may be a simple yet effective way to condition intracortically recorded neural activity for direct control of external devices through BCIs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.