Trial reportCritical care (London, England)2014
Citrate anticoagulation versus systemic heparinisation in continuous venovenous hemofiltration in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury: a multi-center randomized clinical trial.
Trial report in Critical care (London, England), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 78 papers, 10 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Citrate Versus Heparin Anticoagulation in Continuous Venovenous Hemofiltration in Critically Ill Patients With Acute Renal Failure: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Regional Citrate Anticoagulation for Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy During Veno-venous ECMO: a Crossover Randomized Controlled Study
Who cites it
78 citing papers in PubMed, 10 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 181 citations in OpenAlex.
- Sex and gender considerations in randomized controlled trials in critical care nephrology: a meta-epidemiologic study.BMC medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Regional Citrate Anticoagulation Versus Systemic Heparin in Continuous Kidney Replacement Therapy: Examining the Role of Evidence in Health Technology Assessment.Advances in therapy · 2025Pooled it
- A Systematic Bibliometric Analysis of High-Impact Articles in Critical Care Nephrology.Blood purification · 2024Pooled it
- Anticoagulation options for continuous renal replacement therapy in critically ill patients: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Critical care (London, England) · 2023Pooled it
- Management of regional citrate anticoagulation for continuous renal replacement therapy: guideline recommendations from Chinese emergency medical doctor consensus.Military Medical Research · 2023Guideline
- Pharmacological interventions for preventing clotting of extracorporeal circuits during continuous renal replacement therapy.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020Pooled it
- Pharmacological interventions for preventing clotting of extracorporeal circuits during continuous renal replacement therapy.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020Pooled it
- The Japanese clinical practice guideline for acute kidney injury 2016.Clinical and experimental nephrology · 2018Guideline
- Regional citrate versus heparin anticoagulation for continuous renal replacement therapy in critically ill patients: a meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis of randomized controlled trials.Critical care (London, England) · 2016Pooled it
- Citrate versus heparin anticoagulation for continuous renal replacement therapy: an updated meta-analysis of RCTs.Intensive care medicine · 2015Pooled it
- Trial
- Customized Citrate Anticoagulation versus No Anticoagulant in Continuous Venovenous Hemofiltration in Critically Ill Patients with Acute Kidney Injury: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.Blood purification · 2023Trial
- Trial
- Trial
- Trial
- Putative novel mediators of acute kidney injury in critically ill patients: handling by continuous venovenous hemofiltration and effect of anticoagulation modalities.BMC nephrology · 2015Trial
- Efficacy and safety of citrate-based anticoagulation compared to heparin in patients with acute kidney injury requiring continuous renal replacement therapy: a randomized controlled trial.Critical care (London, England) · 2015Trial
- Treatment Effect of Regional Sodium Citrate Anticoagulation in Elderly Patients With High-Risk Bleeding Receiving Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy.Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/HemostasisTrial
- Clinical practice guideline for renal replacement therapy in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury (2026 edition).Journal of intensive medicine · 2026Article
- Comparative efficacy and safety of anticoagulation strategies in continuous renal replacement therapy: a real-world cohort study.BMC nephrology · 2026Article
18 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
12 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionBecause of ongoing controversy, renal and vital outcomes are compared between systemically administered unfractionated heparin and regional anticoagulation with citrate-buffered replacement solution in predilution mode, during continuous venovenous hemofiltration (CVVH) in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury (AKI).
methodsIn this multi-center randomized controlled trial, patients admitted to the intensive care unit requiring CVVH and meeting inclusion criteria, were randomly assigned to citrate or heparin. Primary endpoints were mortality and renal outcome in intention-to-treat analysis. Secondary endpoints were safety and efficacy. Safety was defined as absence of any adverse event necessitating discontinuation of the assigned anticoagulant. For efficacy, among other parameters, survival times of the first hemofilter were studied.
resultsOf the 139 patients enrolled, 66 were randomized to citrate and 73 to heparin. Mortality rates at 28 and 90 days did not differ between groups: 22/66 (33%) of citrate-treated patients died versus 25/72 (35%) of heparin-treated patients at 28 days, and 27/65 (42%) of citrate-treated patients died versus 29/69 (42%) of heparin-treated patients at 90 days (P = 1.00 for both). Renal outcome, i.e. independency of renal replacement therapy 28 days after initiation of CVVH in surviving patients, did not differ between groups: 29/43 (67%) in the citrate-treated patients versus 33/47 (70%) in heparin-treated patients (P = 0.82). Heparin was discontinued in 24/73 (33%) of patients whereas citrate was discontinued in 5/66 (8%) of patients (P < 0.001). Filter survival times were superior for citrate (median 46 versus 32 hours, P = 0.02), as were the number of filters used (P = 0.002) and the off time within 72 hours (P = 0.002). The costs during the first 72 hours of prescribed CVVH were lower in citrate-based CVVH.
conclusionsRenal outcome and patient mortality were similar for citrate and heparin anticoagulation during CVVH in the critically ill patient with AKI. However, citrate was superior in terms of safety, efficacy and costs.
trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov NCT00209378. Registered 13th September 2005.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.