Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25127927›Full record

Trial reportPsychopharmacology2015

Moderating effect of working memory capacity on acute alcohol effects on BOLD response during inhibition and error monitoring in male heavy drinkers.

Eric D Claus, Christian S Hendershot

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Psychopharmacology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Acute effect of alcohol on working memory updating.Addiction (Abingdon, England) · 2021
    Trial
  4. Effects of Alcohol and Acetate on Cerebral Blood Flow: A Pilot Study.Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research · 2019
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Eric D ClausMind Research Network and Lovelace Biomedical and Environmental Research Institute, 1101 Yale Blvd NE, Albuquerque, NM, 87106, USA, eclaus@mrn.org.
Christian S Hendershot
Centre for Addiction and Mental Health · CAEnvironmental Research Institute · GB

Funding

Sensitivity to Intravenous Ethanol: Neuroimaging and Behavioral PhenotypesR21AA020304 · NIAAA · THE MIND RESEARCH NETWORK · PI CLAUS, ERIC D, HENDERSHOT, CHRISTIAN S · 2011 to 2012
$434k
NIAAA NIH HHS R21 AA020304NIAAA NIH HHS R21AA020304
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleWhile alcohol intoxication is known to increase disinhibited behavior, the degree to which disinhibition occurs appears to depend on a number of factors including executive functioning ability. However, the neural mechanisms by which individual differences in executive functioning lead to variable degrees of disinhibition remain unclear.

objectivesThe aim of the current study was to examine the neural mechanisms by which individual differences in working memory (WM) capacity moderate alcohol-induced disinhibition.

methodsSeventeen heavy-drinking males participated in a within-subjects design in which two sessions were completed: an alcohol session (.82 g/kg) and a control session. Participants completed a go/no-go task while undergoing functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) after ingestion of the control or alcohol beverage. WM capacity was measured using an operation span task.

resultsSignificant interactions of session and WM capacity emerged in contrasts examining successful response inhibition within superior temporal gyrus and unsuccessful inhibition in regions within the default mode network. In all cases, individuals with low WM capacity demonstrated a relative decrease in blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) response during the alcohol compared to control session, whereas the high-WM-capacity group demonstrated relative increases in BOLD response in the alcohol compared to control session.

conclusionsLow WM capacity appears to be associated with decreased neural response to signals indicating a need for behavioral control, an effect that may lead to increased difficulty with inhibiting responses and increased negative consequences from alcohol intoxication.

Indexed as

AdultAlcoholic BeveragesAlcoholic IntoxicationAlcohol-Induced Disorders, Nervous SystemEthanolHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMemory DisordersMemory, Short-TermOxygenYoung AdultEthanolOxygen

Identifiers

PMID25127927
PMCPMC4310804
OpenAlexW2083100630

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.