Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25127259›Full record

ArticleOncotarget2014

Expression of stemness genes in primary breast cancer tissues: the role of SOX2 as a prognostic marker for detection of early recurrence.

Mauro Finicelli, Giovanni Benedetti, Tiziana Squillaro, Barbara Pistilli, Andrea Marcellusi, Paola Mariani, Alfredo Santinelli, Luciano Latini, Umberto Galderisi, Antonio Giordano

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncotarget, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Mauro FinicelliHuman Health Foundation, Spoleto, Italy.
Giovanni BenedettiDepartment of Medical Oncology, Macerata Hospital, Macerata, Italy.
Tiziana SquillaroHuman Health Foundation, Spoleto, Italy.
Barbara PistilliDepartment of Medical Oncology, Macerata Hospital, Macerata, Italy.
Andrea MarcellusiDepartment of Statistics, University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Paola MarianiDepartment of Pathology, Macerata Hospital, Macerata, Italy.
Alfredo SantinelliDepartment of Pathology Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy.
Luciano LatiniDepartment of Medical Oncology, Macerata Hospital, Macerata, Italy.
Umberto GalderisiSbarro Institute for Cancer Research and Molecular Medicine, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA. Department of Experimental Medicine, Second University of Naples, Naples, Italy.
Antonio GiordanoHuman Health Foundation, Spoleto, Italy. Sbarro Institute for Cancer Research and Molecular Medicine, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The events leading to breast cancer (BC) progression or recurrence are not completely understood and new prognostic markers aiming at identifying high risk-patients and to develop suitable therapy are highly demanded. Experimental evidences found in cancer cells a deregulated expression of some genes involved in governance of stem cell properties and demonstrated a relationship between stemness genes overexpression and poorly differentiated BC subtypes. In the present study 140 primary invasive BC specimens were collected. The expression profiles of 13 genes belonging to the OCT3/SOX2/NANOG/KLF4 core circuitry by RT-PCR were analyzed and any correlation between their expression and the BC clinic-pathological features (CPfs) and prognosis was investigated. In our cohort (117 samples), NANOG, GDF3 and SOX2 significantly correlated with grade 2, Nodes negative status and higher KI67 proliferation index, respectively (p=0.019, p=0.029, p= 0.035). According to multivariate analysis, SOX2 expression resulted independently associated with increased risk of recurrence (HR= 2,99; p= p=0,004) as well as Nodes status (HR=2,44; p=0,009) and T-size >1 (HR=1,77; p=0,035). Our study provides further proof of the suitable use of stemness genes in BC management. Interestingly, a prognostic role of SOX2, which seems to be a suitable marker of early recurrence irrespective of other clinicopathological features.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsDisease ProgressionFemaleHumansImmunohistochemistryKruppel-Like Factor 4Middle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplastic Stem CellsPrognosisSOXB1 Transcription FactorsTranscriptomeBiomarkers, TumorKLF4 protein, humanKruppel-Like Factor 4SOX2 protein, humanSOXB1 Transcription Factors

Identifiers

PMID25127259
PMCPMC4259429

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.