Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25126851›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Large-scale, high-resolution multielectrode-array recording depicts functional network differences of cortical and hippocampal cultures.

Shinya Ito, Fang-Chin Yeh, Emma Hiolski, Przemyslaw Rydygier, Deborah E Gunning, Pawel Hottowy, Nicholas Timme, Alan M Litke, John M Beggs

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Shinya ItoSanta Cruz Institute for Particle Physics, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, California, United States of America; Department of Physics, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, United States of America.
Fang-Chin YehDepartment of Physics, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, United States of America.
Emma HiolskiMicrobiology and Environmental Toxicology Department, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, California, United States of America.
Przemyslaw RydygierFaculty of Physics and Applied Computer Science, AGH University of Science and Technology, Kraków, Poland.
Deborah E GunningInstitute of Photonics, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Pawel HottowyFaculty of Physics and Applied Computer Science, AGH University of Science and Technology, Kraków, Poland.
Nicholas TimmeDepartment of Physics, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, United States of America.
Alan M LitkeSanta Cruz Institute for Particle Physics, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, California, United States of America.
John M BeggsDepartment of Physics, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding the detailed circuitry of functioning neuronal networks is one of the major goals of neuroscience. Recent improvements in neuronal recording techniques have made it possible to record the spiking activity from hundreds of neurons simultaneously with sub-millisecond temporal resolution. Here we used a 512-channel multielectrode array system to record the activity from hundreds of neurons in organotypic cultures of cortico-hippocampal brain slices from mice. To probe the network structure, we employed a wavelet transform of the cross-correlogram to categorize the functional connectivity in different frequency ranges. With this method we directly compare, for the first time, in any preparation, the neuronal network structures of cortex and hippocampus, on the scale of hundreds of neurons, with sub-millisecond time resolution. Among the three frequency ranges that we investigated, the lower two frequency ranges (gamma (30-80 Hz) and beta (12-30 Hz) range) showed similar network structure between cortex and hippocampus, but there were many significant differences between these structures in the high frequency range (100-1000 Hz). The high frequency networks in cortex showed short tailed degree-distributions, shorter decay length of connectivity density, smaller clustering coefficients, and positive assortativity. Our results suggest that our method can characterize frequency dependent differences of network architecture from different brain regions. Crucially, because these differences between brain regions require millisecond temporal scales to be observed and characterized, these results underscore the importance of high temporal resolution recordings for the understanding of functional networks in neuronal systems.

Indexed as

Nerve NetAction PotentialsAnimalsElectroencephalographyFemaleHippocampusMaleMice, Inbred C57BLTissue Culture Techniques

Identifiers

PMID25126851
PMCPMC4134292

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.