Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25126556›Full record

ArticleBioMed research international2014

Identifying the gene signatures from gene-pathway bipartite network guarantees the robust model performance on predicting the cancer prognosis.

Li He, Yuelong Wang, Yongning Yang, Liqiu Huang, Zhining Wen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BioMed research international, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Li HeBiogas Institute of Ministry of Agriculture, Chengdu 610041, China.
Yuelong WangCollege of Chemistry, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610064, China.
Yongning YangCollege of Chemistry, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610064, China.
Liqiu HuangCollege of Chemistry, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610064, China.
Zhining WenCollege of Chemistry, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610064, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For the purpose of improving the prediction of cancer prognosis in the clinical researches, various algorithms have been developed to construct the predictive models with the gene signatures detected by DNA microarrays. Due to the heterogeneity of the clinical samples, the list of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) generated by the statistical methods or the machine learning algorithms often involves a number of false positive genes, which are not associated with the phenotypic differences between the compared clinical conditions, and subsequently impacts the reliability of the predictive models. In this study, we proposed a strategy, which combined the statistical algorithm with the gene-pathway bipartite networks, to generate the reliable lists of cancer-related DEGs and constructed the models by using support vector machine for predicting the prognosis of three types of cancers, namely, breast cancer, acute myeloma leukemia, and glioblastoma. Our results demonstrated that, combined with the gene-pathway bipartite networks, our proposed strategy can efficiently generate the reliable cancer-related DEG lists for constructing the predictive models. In addition, the model performance in the swap analysis was similar to that in the original analysis, indicating the robustness of the models in predicting the cancer outcomes.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticAlgorithmsArtificial IntelligenceGene Expression ProfilingGene Regulatory NetworksHumansNeoplasm ProteinsNeoplasmsOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisPrognosisSupport Vector MachineNeoplasm Proteins

Identifiers

PMID25126556
PMCPMC4122106

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.