ArticleAmerican health & drug benefits2010
A comparison of drug formularies and the potential for cost-savings.
Article in American health & drug benefits, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Developing a national formulary based on a unified payment system in Iran.Electronic physician · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBrand-name drug costs have been escalating in the United States, and the reasons for this are not immediately clear. A lack of adequate and accurate information about drug effectiveness, safety, and cost has implications for drug utilization and cost.
objectiveTo explore the extent to which health plan formularies were consistent with recommended drug listings and identify what would be the potential cost-savings on total drug expenditures if the utilization rate of the recommended therapies was increased.
methodThis study compared publicly available recommended drug listings with the formularies of 8 major health plans in Minnesota. Data from 1 of the health plans underwent an in-depth case analysis to evaluate the potential impact on pharmaceutical expenditures, using increased utilization rate scenarios of the recommended drugs.
resultsHealth plans were similar with respect to degree of coverage for the recommended drugs. However, the case analysis showed that by increasing the utilization rate of recommended drugs, a potential cost-savings of more than 50% could be realized for the evaluated health plan for some therapeutic categories.
conclusionThis study demonstrates an approach to assessing drug formularies using publicly available, recommended drug lists that incorporated evidence for effectiveness, safety, and cost. By using the application of this type of reliable information, formulary changes can be guided to incentivize value-based utilization for patient populations.
Identifiers
25126325PMC4106615What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.