ArticleAmerican health & drug benefits2010
Physicians' perceptions of reimbursement as a barrier to comprehensive diabetes care.
Article in American health & drug benefits, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Limited preventive care among Medicaid enrollees with HIV in the US South.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Exercise Prescription Principles among Physicians and Physical Therapists for Patients with Impaired Glucose Control: A Cross-Sectional Study.Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology · 2023Article
- Collaborative care model for diabetes in primary care settings in Qatar: a qualitative exploration among healthcare professionals and patients who experienced the service.BMC health services research · 2021Article
- Worldwide inertia to the use of cardiorenal protective glucose-lowering drugs (SGLT2i and GLP-1 RA) in high-risk patients with type 2 diabetes.Cardiovascular diabetology · 2020Article
- Depression: a common and burdensome complication of diabetes that warrants the continued attention of clinicians, researchers and healthcare policy makers.Diabetologia · 2017Article
- Review of strategies to enhance outcomes for patients with type 2 diabetes: payers' perspective.American health & drug benefits · 2011Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAs the incidence of diabetes increases, there is growing concern about the adequacy of reimbursement levels for delivering comprehensive diabetes care.
objectiveTo investigate physicians' perceptions of the adequacy of reimbursement, as well as resources (eg, staff, facilities, materials), for their treatment of diabetic patients.
methodsA qualitative exploration using a Web-based survey of 300 physicians (200 primary care providers and 100 endocrinologists) and an online discussion group of 12 physicians, focusing on 10 services recommended by the American Diabetes Association that may be prone to underreimbursement. The 10 services were matched with 4 general diabetes care categories to assess the adequacy of care delivery.
resultsThe majority of physician study participants perceived that most of the 10 identified services are inadequately reimbursed-83% to 95% of physicians said Medicaid reimbursement was inadequate, 75% to 89% for Medicare reimbursement, and 67% to 86% for private insurance reimbursement-leading them to spend less time with each patient. This reduction in time was a limiting factor to providing comprehensive diabetes care. The survey also revealed differences between endocrinologists and primary care physicians; for example, medical nutrition therapy was offered by 50% of endocrinology practices compared with only 29.5% of primary care practices.
conclusionThis study confirms previous findings that physicians perceive current reimbursement for diabetes care as too low, which limits their ability to perform all the tasks necessary to deliver comprehensive diabetes care.
Identifiers
25126307PMC4106549W2169616599What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.