Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25126065›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2014

Learning to perceive in the sensorimotor approach: Piaget's theory of equilibration interpreted dynamically.

Ezequiel Alejandro Di Paolo, Xabier E Barandiaran, Michael Beaton, Thomas Buhrmann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. A Model of Unified Perception and Cognition.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Mindful movement and skilled attention.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2015
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ezequiel Alejandro Di PaoloIkerbasque, Basque Foundation for Science Bizkaia, Spain ; IAS-Research Center for Life, Mind, and Society, Department of Logic and Philosophy of Science, University of the Basque Country San Sebastián, Spain ; Centre for Computational Neuroscience and Robotics, Department of Informatics, University of Sussex Brighton, UK.
Xabier E BarandiaranIAS-Research Center for Life, Mind, and Society, Department of Logic and Philosophy of Science, University of the Basque Country San Sebastián, Spain ; Department of Philosophy, University School of Social Work, UPV/EHU University of the Basque Country San Sebastián, Spain.
Michael BeatonIAS-Research Center for Life, Mind, and Society, Department of Logic and Philosophy of Science, University of the Basque Country San Sebastián, Spain ; Centre for Computational Neuroscience and Robotics, Department of Informatics, University of Sussex Brighton, UK.
Thomas BuhrmannIAS-Research Center for Life, Mind, and Society, Department of Logic and Philosophy of Science, University of the Basque Country San Sebastián, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

learning to perceive is faced with a classical paradoxif understanding is required for perception, how can we learn to perceive something new, something we do not yet understand? According to the sensorimotor approach, perception involves mastery of regular sensorimotor co-variations that depend on the agent and the environment, also known as the "laws" of sensorimotor contingencies (SMCs). In this sense, perception involves enacting relevant sensorimotor skills in each situation. It is important for this proposal that such skills can be learned and refined with experience and yet up to this date, the sensorimotor approach has had no explicit theory of perceptual learning. The situation is made more complex if we acknowledge the open-ended nature of human learning. In this paper we propose Piaget's theory of equilibration as a potential candidate to fulfill this role. This theory highlights the importance of intrinsic sensorimotor norms, in terms of the closure of sensorimotor schemes. It also explains how the equilibration of a sensorimotor organization faced with novelty or breakdowns proceeds by re-shaping pre-existing structures in coupling with dynamical regularities of the world. This way learning to perceive is guided by the equilibration of emerging forms of skillful coping with the world. We demonstrate the compatibility between Piaget's theory and the sensorimotor approach by providing a dynamical formalization of equilibration to give an explicit micro-genetic account of sensorimotor learning and, by extension, of how we learn to perceive. This allows us to draw important lessons in the form of general principles for open-ended sensorimotor learning, including the need for an intrinsic normative evaluation by the agent itself. We also explore implications of our micro-genetic account at the personal level.

Indexed as

dynamical systemsopen-ended learningPiaget’s theory of equilibrationsensorimotor contingencies

Identifiers

PMID25126065
PMCPMC4115614

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.