Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25124305›Full record

ArticleDrug and alcohol dependence2014

Separate and combined effects of the GABAA positive allosteric modulator diazepam and Δ⁹-THC in humans discriminating Δ⁹-THC.

Joshua A Lile, Thomas H Kelly, Lon R Hays

Open access · greenAbstract readControlled Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Article in Drug and alcohol dependence, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Sex differences in the subjective effects of oral ΔPharmacology, biochemistry, and behavior · 2017
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Joshua A LileDepartment of Behavioral Science, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Medical Behavioral Science Building, Lexington, KY 40536-0086, USA; Department of Psychiatry, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, 3470 Blazer Pkwy, Lexington, KY 40509-1810, USA. Electronic address: jalile2@uky.edu.
Thomas H KellyDepartment of Behavioral Science, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Medical Behavioral Science Building, Lexington, KY 40536-0086, USA; Department of Psychology, University of Kentucky College of Arts and Sciences, 106-B Kastle Hall, Lexington, KY 40506-0044, USA; Department of Psychiatry, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, 3470 Blazer Pkwy, Lexington, KY 40509-1810, USA.
Lon R HaysDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, 3470 Blazer Pkwy, Lexington, KY 40509-1810, USA; Department of Internal Medicine, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, 740 South Limestone St., J525 Kentucky Clinic, Lexington, KY 40536-0284, USA.
University of Kentucky · US

Funding

Training and Pilot CoreP50DA005312 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI KELLY, THOMAS H. · 1987 to 2016
$19.5M
Kentucky Center for Clinical and Translational ScienceUL1TR000117 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI KERN, PHILIP A · 2012 to 2015
$13.3M
GABA Drugs for Cannabis-Use Disorders: Initial Mechanistic Studies in HumansR01DA025605 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI LILE, JOSHUA ANTHONY · 2008 to 2011
$1.4M
Medications Development for Cannabis-Use Disorders: Clinical StudiesK02DA031766 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI LILE, JOSHUA ANTHONY · 2011 to 2015
$487k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000117NCATS NIH HHS UL1TR000117NIDA NIH HHS K02 DA031766NIDA NIH HHS P50 DA005312NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA025605
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOur previous research suggested the involvement of γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA), in particular the GABAB receptor subtype, in the interoceptive effects of Δ(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ(9)-THC). The aim of the present study was to determine the potential involvement of the GABAA receptor subtype by assessing the separate and combined effects of the GABAA positive allosteric modulator diazepam and Δ(9)-THC using pharmacologically selective drug-discrimination procedures.

methodsTen cannabis users learned to discriminate 30 mg oral Δ(9)-THC from placebo and then received diazepam (5 and 10mg), Δ(9)-THC (5, 15 and 30 mg) and placebo, alone and in combination. Self-report, task performance and physiological measures were also collected.

resultsΔ(9)-THC functioned as a discriminative stimulus, produced subjective effects typically associated with cannabinoids (e.g., High, Stoned, Like Drug) and elevated heart rate. Diazepam alone impaired performance on psychomotor performance tasks and increased ratings on a limited number of self-report questionnaire items (e.g., Any Effect, Sedated), but did not substitute for the Δ(9)-THC discriminative stimulus or alter the Δ(9)-THC discrimination dose-response function. Similarly, diazepam had limited impact on the other behavioral effects of Δ(9)-THC.

conclusionsThese results suggest that the GABAA receptor subtype has minimal involvement in the interoceptive effects of Δ(9)-THC, and by extension cannabis, in humans.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAllosteric RegulationBlood PressureBody TemperatureCannabinoid Receptor AgonistsDiazepamDiscrimination LearningDose-Response Relationship, DrugDronabinolDrug InteractionsDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleGABA-A Receptor AgonistsGABA ModulatorsHeart RateCannabinoid Receptor AgonistsDiazepamDronabinolGABA-A Receptor AgonistsGABA ModulatorsReceptors, GABA-ACardiovascularDigit-symbol-substitution taskDrug discriminationMarijuanaRepeated acquisition taskSubjective effects

Identifiers

PMID25124305
PMCPMC4167716
OpenAlexW1973022645

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.