Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25124164›Full record

ReviewInternational wound journal2016

Vitamin E and wound healing: an evidence-based review.

Rachel Hobson

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International wound journal, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 100 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Review
  12. Vitamin E incorporated in Carboxymethyl Cellulose-Gelatin Hydrogel Increases Wound Healing.International journal of molecular and cellular medicine · 2025
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Pharmacotherapy for Keloids and Hypertrophic Scars.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Neuroprotective effect ofFrontiers in pharmacology · 2024
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Rachel HobsonWound Healing and Tissue Repair, Cardiff University, Wales, UK.
Wound Healing Society · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vitamin E has been demonstrated to modulate cellular signalling, gene expression and affect wounds infected with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), thus influencing wound healing. This evidence-based review aimed to identify and evaluate current research assessing the properties of vitamin E in relation to wound healing, through its role as an antioxidant and its influence on connective tissue growth factor (CTGF), MRSA and gene transcription. Literature dated from 1996 to 2012, published in English, involving either animals or adult humans with an acute or chronic wound were included. The databases that contained relevant articles were narrowed down to four, and a total of 33 identified studies were included. The literature review revealed that there is a significant dearth of robust studies establishing the effects of vitamin E on wound healing, and further research is clearly warranted.

Indexed as

Wound HealingAnimalsHumansMethicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureusVitamin EVitamin EAntioxidantGene transcriptionMRSAVitamin EWound healing

Identifiers

PMID25124164
PMCPMC7949595
OpenAlexW1515205682

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.