Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25124162›Full record

ArticleGynecologic oncology2014

SGO guidance document for clinical trial designs in ovarian cancer: a changing paradigm.

Thomas J Herzog, Ronald D Alvarez, Angeles Secord, Barbara A Goff, Robert S Mannel, Bradley J Monk, Robert L Coleman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gynecologic oncology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Ovarian cancer.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2016
    Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Thomas J HerzogUniversity of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Ronald D AlvarezUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Angeles SecordDuke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC, USA.
Barbara A GoffUniversity of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Robert S MannelUniversity of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK, USA.
Bradley J MonkUniversity of Arizona Cancer Center, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Robert L ColemanThe University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA. Electronic address: rcoleman@mdanderson.org.

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Scott Kopetz · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
Cancer Center Planning Grant (P20)P20CA097943 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA HLTH SCIENCES CTR · PI MANNEL, ROBERT S · 2002 to 2006
$1.2M
NCI NIH HHS P20 CA097943NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo explore and facilitate the multifaceted process of drug development and regulatory approval in ovarian cancer.

methodsThe Society of Gynecologic Oncology (SGO) recently sought and received input from multiple stakeholders including the National Cancer Institute's (NCI) Clinical Therapy Evaluation Program (CTEP), the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), pharmaceutical industry, and patient advocates. This whitepaper is the work product and opinion solely of the SGO.

resultsThis document summarizes the SGO's interpretation of these meetings and the current regulatory environment where there has been a paucity of recent approvals in the United States. It provides guidance in clinical trial design with the express purpose of encouraging novel drug development in ovarian cancer. Points of emphasis include: ovarian cancer heterogeneity (histologic subtypes and molecular genetic alterations), clinical trial design elements, surrogate as well as composite endpoints, and the four principles of clinical drug development (unmet medical need, discovery, safety, and efficacy).

conclusionsThere has been an evolution in the acceptance of surrogate endpoints depending upon the clinical setting in ovarian cancer. While overall survival (OS) remains the most objective clinical trial endpoint, there is now realization that demanding OS as the primary endpoint has many obstacles. Ovarian cancer is a heterogeneous disease that is now divided by histologic subtypes. Future registration strategies will need to address disease heterogeneity. The exploration of currently acceptable clinical trial endpoints and alternative regulatory strategies will hopefully stimulate interest in novel drug development for patients with ovarian cancer.

Indexed as

Clinical Trials as TopicFemaleHumansOvarian NeoplasmsPractice Guidelines as TopicResearch DesignTreatment OutcomeClinical trial endpointsOvarian cancerOverall survivalPatient reported outcomesProgression free survival

Identifiers

PMID25124162
PMCPMC4698962

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.