Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25124140›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2014

HIV testing preferences in Tanzania: a qualitative exploration of the importance of confidentiality, accessibility, and quality of service.

Bernard Njau, Jan Ostermann, Derek Brown, Axel Mühlbacher, Elizabeth Reddy, Nathan Thielman

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02714140 (Does Preference-based HIV Testing Increase Uptake in High Risk Populations?), which is not on this map. Cited by 36 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02714140 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Does Preference-based HIV Testing Increase Uptake in High Risk Populations?

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of South CarolinaRan2018 to 2020Enrolled1,194ConditionsHIV TestingArmsPB-HCT +, PB-HCT -, Economic incentive, PB-HCT ++, SMS Reminder
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Frontiers in public health · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. The Shinyanga Patient: A Patient's Journey through HIV Treatment Cascade in Rural Tanzania.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Bernard Njau
Jan Ostermann
Derek Brown
Axel Mühlbacher
Elizabeth Reddy
Nathan ThielmanDuke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, USA. n.thielman@duke.edu.

Funding

Social and Behavioral Sciences CoreP30AI064518 · NIAID · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI GEORGIA Doris TOMARAS · 2005 to 2026
$50.5M
Integrated Prediction of Protein Struture at 1D, 2D and 3D LevelsR01GM093123 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI-COLUMBIA · PI CHENG, JIANLIN · 2010 to 2023
$3.8M
Using Discrete Choice Experiments to Identify HIV Testing Preferences in TanzaniaR21MH096631 · NIMH · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI OSTERMANN, JAN, THIELMAN, NATHAN M · 2012 to 2013
$387k
NIAID NIH HHS 5P30 AI064518NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI064518NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM093123NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH096631
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHIV counseling and testing (HCT), an effective preventive strategy and an entry point for care, remains under-utilized in Tanzania. Limited uptake of HCT, despite the widespread availability of varied testing options, suggests that existing options may not align well with population preferences for testing.

methodsBetween October and December 2011, we conducted an exploratory study in the Kilimanjaro Region to develop a conceptual framework for understanding which characteristics of HIV testing are associated with preferences for testing. Forty individuals (55% women, 53% never having tested) participated in in-depth interviews and focus groups to identify factors that influence whether and where people test for HIV.

resultsA variety of discrete characteristics of testing venues, test providers, and testing procedures (e.g. distance to testing, counselor experience, type of HIV test, and availability of antiretroviral therapy) mapped conceptually to three domains: confidentiality of testing and test results, quality of HCT, and accessibility and availability of ancillary services. We noted heterogeneous preferences and demonstrate that while some test characteristics overlap and reinforce across multiple domains, others demand clients to make trade-offs between domains.

conclusionTesting decisions appear to be influenced by an array of often inter-linked factors across multiple domains, including quality, confidentiality, and accessibility; perceptions of these factors varied greatly across participants and across available testing options. HCT interventions that jointly target barriers spanning the three domains have the potential to increase uptake of HIV testing and deserve further exploration.

Indexed as

ConfidentialityPatient PreferenceAdultCounselingFemaleFocus GroupsHealth Services AccessibilityHIV InfectionsHumansMaleMass ScreeningQuality of Health CareTanzania

Identifiers

PMID25124140
PMCPMC4141951

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.