Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25123718›Full record

ReviewYearbook of medical informatics2014

Big Data Usage Patterns in the Health Care Domain: A Use Case Driven Approach Applied to the Assessment of Vaccination Benefits and Risks. Contribution of the IMIA Primary Healthcare Working Group.

H Liyanage, S de Lusignan, S-T Liaw, C E Kuziemsky, F Mold, P Krause, D Fleming, S Jones

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Yearbook of medical informatics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Using Distributed Data over HBase in Big Data Analytics Platform for Clinical Services.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2017
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

H Liyanage
S de LusignanSimon de Lusignan, Clinical Informatics & Health Outcomes research group, Department of Health Care Policy and Management, University of Surrey, GUILDFORD, Surrey GU2 7XH, UK, E-mail: s.lusignan@surrey.ac.uk.
S-T Liaw
C E Kuziemsky
F Mold
P Krause
D Fleming
S Jones

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGenerally benefits and risks of vaccines can be determined from studies carried out as part of regulatory compliance, followed by surveillance of routine data; however there are some rarer and more long term events that require new methods. Big data generated by increasingly affordable personalised computing, and from pervasive computing devices is rapidly growing and low cost, high volume, cloud computing makes the processing of these data inexpensive.

objectiveTo describe how big data and related analytical methods might be applied to assess the benefits and risks of vaccines.

methodWe reviewed the literature on the use of big data to improve health, applied to generic vaccine use cases, that illustrate benefits and risks of vaccination. We defined a use case as the interaction between a user and an information system to achieve a goal. We used flu vaccination and pre-school childhood immunisation as exemplars.

resultsWe reviewed three big data use cases relevant to assessing vaccine benefits and risks: (i) Big data processing using crowdsourcing, distributed big data processing, and predictive analytics, (ii) Data integration from heterogeneous big data sources, e.g. the increasing range of devices in the "internet of things", and (iii) Real-time monitoring for the direct monitoring of epidemics as well as vaccine effects via social media and other data sources.

conclusionsBig data raises new ethical dilemmas, though its analysis methods can bring complementary real-time capabilities for monitoring epidemics and assessing vaccine benefit-risk balance.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyDatabases, FactualData MiningVaccinationEpidemicsHumansMedical InformaticsMedical Records Systems, ComputerizedPopulation Surveillancecomputerizedimmunizationinformation sciencemedical record systemsPopulation surveillancepublic health

Identifiers

PMID25123718
PMCPMC4287086

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.