Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25123055›Full record

ArticleMalaria journal2014

Comparison of three methods for detection of gametocytes in Melanesian children treated for uncomplicated malaria.

Stephan Karl, Moses Laman, Tamarah Koleala, Clemencia Ibam, Bernadine Kasian, Nola N'Drewei, Anna Rosanas-Urgell, Brioni R Moore, Andreea Waltmann, Cristian Koepfli and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Malaria journal, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Prevalence of submicroscopicMalariaWorld journal · 2016
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Stephan KarlSchool of Medicine and Pharmacology, University of Western Australia, Fremantle Hospital, Fremantle, Western Australia, Australia. karl@wehi.edu.au.
Moses Laman
Tamarah Koleala
Clemencia Ibam
Bernadine Kasian
Nola N'Drewei
Anna Rosanas-Urgell
Brioni R Moore
Andreea Waltmann
Cristian Koepfli
Peter M Siba
Inoni Betuela
Robert C Woodward
Timothy G St Pierre
Ivo Mueller
Timothy M E Davis
Papua New Guinea Institute of Medical Research · PGUniversity of Western Australia · AUCentre de Recerca en Economia Internacional · ESFremantle Hospital · AUUniversity of Melbourne · AUWalter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGametocytes are the transmission stages of Plasmodium parasites, the causative agents of malaria. As their density in the human host is typically low, they are often undetected by conventional light microscopy. Furthermore, application of RNA-based molecular detection methods for gametocyte detection remains challenging in remote field settings. In the present study, a detailed comparison of three methods, namely light microscopy, magnetic fractionation and reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction for detection of Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax gametocytes was conducted.

methodsPeripheral blood samples from 70 children aged 0.5 to five years with uncomplicated malaria who were treated with either artemether-lumefantrine or artemisinin-naphthoquine were collected from two health facilities on the north coast of Papua New Guinea. The samples were taken prior to treatment (day 0) and at pre-specified intervals during follow-up. Gametocytes were measured in each sample by three methods: i) light microscopy (LM), ii) quantitative magnetic fractionation (MF) and, iii) reverse transcriptase PCR (RTPCR). Data were analysed using censored linear regression and Bland and Altman techniques.

resultsMF and RTPCR were similarly sensitive and specific, and both were superior to LM. Overall, there were approximately 20% gametocyte-positive samples by LM, whereas gametocyte positivity by MF and RTPCR were both more than two-fold this level. In the subset of samples collected prior to treatment, 29% of children were positive by LM, and 85% were gametocyte positive by MF and RTPCR, respectively.

conclusionsThe present study represents the first direct comparison of standard LM, MF and RTPCR for gametocyte detection in field isolates. It provides strong evidence that MF is superior to LM and can be used to detect gametocytaemic patients under field conditions with similar sensitivity and specificity as RTPCR.

Indexed as

AntimalarialsArtemether, Lumefantrine Drug CombinationArtemisininsChild, PreschoolClinical Laboratory TechniquesDrug CombinationsEthanolaminesFemaleFluorenesHumansImmunomagnetic SeparationInfantMalariaMaleMicroscopyNaphthoquinonesAntimalarialsArtemether, Lumefantrine Drug Combinationartemisinin-naphthoquine combinationArtemisininsDrug CombinationsEthanolaminesFluorenesNaphthoquinones

Identifiers

PMID25123055
PMCPMC4139605
OpenAlexW2120343245

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.