Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25123019›Full record

ArticleMicrocirculation (New York, N.Y. : 1994)2014

Itching for answers: how histamine relaxes lymphatic vessels.

Joshua P Scallan, Michael J Davis

Abstract readEditorialComment
In one paragraph

Article in Microcirculation (New York, N.Y. : 1994), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 90% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The Function ofbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Joshua P ScallanDepartment of Medical Pharmacology & Physiology, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri.
Michael J Davis
University of Missouri · US

Funding

Mechanisms of lymphatic valve and pump dysfunction in lymphedemaR01HL120867 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI-COLUMBIA · PI DAVIS, MICHAEL JOHN · 2014 to 2017
$1.5M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL120867
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the current issue of Microcirculation, studies by Kurtz et al. and Nizamutdinova et al. together provide new evidence supporting a role for histamine as an endothelial-derived molecule that inhibits lymphatic muscle contraction. In particular, Nizamutdinova et al. show that the effects of flow-induced shear stress on lymphatic endothelium are mediated by both nitric oxide and histamine, since only blockade of both prevents contraction strength and frequency from being altered by flow. Separately, Kurtz et al. used confocal microscopy to determine a preferential expression of histamine receptors on the lymphatic endothelium and demonstrated that histamine applied to spontaneously contracting collecting lymphatics inhibits contractions. Previous studies disagreed on whether histamine stimulates or inhibits lymphatic contractions, but also used differing concentrations, species, and preparations. Together these new reports shed light on how histamine acts within the lymphatic vasculature, but also raise important questions about the cell type on which histamine exerts its effects and the signaling pathways involved. This editorial briefly discusses the contribution of each study and its relevance to lymphatic biology.

Indexed as

AnimalsEndothelium, LymphaticHistamineLymphatic VesselsMaleNitric OxideReceptors, Histamine H1Receptors, Histamine H2HistamineNitric OxideReceptors, Histamine H1Receptors, Histamine H2histaminelymphatic smooth musclenitric oxideshear stressspontaneous contractions

Identifiers

PMID25123019
PMCPMC6859891
OpenAlexW2037235687

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.