Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25122856›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2014

Mupirocin-induced mutations in ileS in various genetic backgrounds of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Andie S Lee, Yann Gizard, Joanna Empel, Eve-Julie Bonetti, Stephan Harbarth, Patrice François

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Andie S LeeInfection Control Programme, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Geneva Hospitals and Faculty of Medicine, Geneva, Switzerland Departments of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
Yann GizardGenomic Research Laboratory, University of Geneva Hospitals and Faculty of Medicine, Geneva, Switzerland.
Joanna EmpelDepartment of Epidemiology and Clinical Microbiology, National Medicines Institute, Warsaw, Poland.
Eve-Julie BonettiGenomic Research Laboratory, University of Geneva Hospitals and Faculty of Medicine, Geneva, Switzerland.
Stephan HarbarthInfection Control Programme, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Geneva Hospitals and Faculty of Medicine, Geneva, Switzerland.
Patrice FrançoisGenomic Research Laboratory, University of Geneva Hospitals and Faculty of Medicine, Geneva, Switzerland patrice.francois@genomic.ch.
University of Geneva · CHNarodowy Instytut Leków · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Topical mupirocin is widely used for the decolonization of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) carriers. We evaluated the capacity of various MRSA clonotypes to develop mutations in the ileS gene associated with low-level mupirocin resistance. Twenty-four mupirocin-sensitive MRSA isolates from a variety of genotypes (determined by a multilocus variable-number tandem-repeat assay) were selected. Mupirocin MICs were determined by Etest. The isolates were then incubated in subinhibitory concentrations of mupirocin for 7 to 14 days. Repeat MIC determinations and sequencing of the ileS gene were then performed. Doubling times of isolates exposed to mupirocin and of unexposed isolates were compared. We found that exposure to mupirocin led to rapid induction of low-level resistance (MICs of 8 to 24 μg/ml) in 11 of 24 (46%) MRSA isolates. This phenomenon was observed in strains with diverse genetic backgrounds. Various mutations were detected in 18 of 24 (75%) MRSA isolates. Acquisition of mutations appeared to be a stepwise process during prolonged incubation with the drug. Among the five isolates exhibiting low-level resistance and the highest MICs, four tested sensitive after incubation in the absence of mupirocin but there was no reversion to the susceptible wild-type primary sequence. Resistance was not associated with significant fitness cost, suggesting that MRSA strains with low-level mupirocin resistance may have a selective advantage in facilities where mupirocin is commonly used. Our findings emphasize the importance of the judicious use of this topical agent and the need to closely monitor for the emergence of resistance.

Indexed as

Drug Resistance, BacterialMutation, MissenseSelection, GeneticAnti-Bacterial AgentsDNA, BacterialHumansIsoleucine-tRNA LigaseMethicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureusMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMupirocinSequence Analysis, DNAAnti-Bacterial AgentsDNA, BacterialIsoleucine-tRNA LigaseMupirocin

Identifiers

PMID25122856
PMCPMC4187773
OpenAlexW2062450030

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.