Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25122832›Full record

ArticleCanadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien2014

Collaboration between family physicians and nurse clinicians: opinions of graduates in family medicine.

Brigitte Maheux, Luc Côté, Omobola Sobanjo, Louise Authier, Julie Lajeunesse, Mylène Leclerc, Louise Lefort

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 77% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Brigitte MaheuxProfessor in the Department of Social and Preventive Medicine at the University of Montreal in Quebec. brigitte.maheux@umontreal.ca.
Luc CôtéProfessor in the Department of Family and Emergency Medicine at Laval University in Quebec city, Que.
Omobola SobanjoClinical consultant and Teaching Chair in Prevention at the University of Montreal.
Louise AuthierAssociate Clinical Professor in the Department of Family and Emergency Medicine at the University of Montreal.
Julie LajeunesseFamily physician clinical instructor at the Clinique de médecine familiale Notre-Dame in Montreal.
Mylène LeclercNurse clinician and clinical instructor at the Clinique de médecine familiale Notre-Dame in Montreal.
Louise LefortResearch assistant and Teaching Chair in Prevention at the University of Montreal at the time of the study.
Hôpital Notre-Dame · CACollege of Family Physicians of Canada · CAThe Centers · USUniversité de Montréal · CAUniversité Laval · CAUniversity Teaching Hospital · ZM

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine whether graduating family physicians are exposed to collaboration between family physicians and nurse clinicians during their training, as well as their opinions about shared care between doctors and nurse clinicians in the delivery of patient care.

designAnonymous online survey.

settingTwo French-Canadian university family medicine residency programs.

participantsThe 2010 and 2011 graduating family physicians (N = 343) from the University of Montreal and Laval University in Quebec.

main outcome measuresThe extent to which nurse clinicians in graduating family physicians' training milieu were involved in preventive and curative patient care activities, and graduates' opinions about nurse clinicians sharing care with physicians.

resultsOf 343 graduates, 186 (54.2%) participated in the survey. Although as residents in family medicine their exposure to shared care with nurse clinicians was somewhat limited, respondents indicated that they were generally quite open to the idea of sharing care with nurse clinicians. More than 70% of respondents agreed or strongly agreed that nurse clinicians could adjust, according to protocols of clinical guidelines, the treatment of patients with diabetes, hypertension, and asthma, as well as regulate medication for pain control in terminally ill patients. By contrast, respondents were less favourable to nurse clinicians adjusting the treatment of patients with depression. More than 80% of respondents agreed or strongly agreed that nurse clinicians could initiate treatment via a medical directive for routine hormonal contraception, acne, uncomplicated cystitis, and sexually transmitted infections. Respondents' opinions on nurse clinicians initiating treatment for pharyngitis and otitis were more divided.

conclusionGraduating family physicians are quite open to collaborating with nurse clinicians. Although they have observed some collaboration between physicians and nurses, there are areas of shared clinical activities in which they would benefit from further exposure and training.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelCooperative BehaviorNurse CliniciansPhysicians, FamilyFamily PracticeFemaleHumansInternship and ResidencyMaleQuebecSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID25122832
PMCPMC4131978
OpenAlexW2160443772

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.