Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25122831›Full record

SynthesisCanadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien2014

Systematic review of clinical features of suspected colorectal cancer in primary care.

M Elisabeth Del Giudice, Emily T Vella, Amanda Hey, Marko Simunovic, William Harris, Cheryl Levitt

Open access · greenAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Development and Implementation of a Digital Quality Measure of Emergency Cancer Diagnosis.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Topical treatments for anal fissure.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2023
    Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Cancer diagnosis in primary care: Six steps to reducing the diagnostic interval.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2021
    Article
  11. Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Observational
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

M Elisabeth Del GiudicePhysician with the Sunnybrook Academic Family Health Team in Toronto, Ont, and is Regional Primary Care Cancer Lead for the Toronto Central Local Health Integration Network. ccopgi@mcmaster.ca.
Emily T VellaHealth Research Methodologist in the Department of Oncology at McMaster University in Hamilton, Ont, and for Cancer Care Ontario's Program in Evidence-based Care. ccopgi@mcmaster.ca.
Amanda HeyRegional Primary Care Lead at the Northeast Cancer Centre in Sudbury, Ont.
Marko SimunovicSurgical oncologist at the Juravinski Cancer Centre in Hamilton.
William HarrisSurgeon at Thunder Bay Regional Health Sciences Centre in Ontario.
Cheryl LevittProfessor in the Department of Family Medicine at McMaster University and Past Provincial Primary Care Lead at Cancer Care Ontario.
Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada) · CACancer Care Ontario · CAConnecticut Center for Primary Care · USMcMaster University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo systematically review the diagnostic accuracy of clinical features associated with colorectal cancer (CRC) presenting in primary care. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched for studies in primary care that provided information on clinical features predictive of CRC. Positive predictive values were used to guide the determination of clinical features associated with increased risk of CRC. STUDY SELECTION: Systematic reviews or primary studies that provided possible clinical features predictive of CRC were included. SYNTHESIS: Clinical features of patients presenting in primary care that are associated with increased risk of CRC, listed in descending order of association, included palpable rectal or abdominal mass; rectal bleeding combined with weight loss; iron deficiency anemia; rectal bleeding mixed with stool; rectal bleeding in the absence of perianal symptoms; rectal bleeding combined with change in bowel habits; dark rectal bleeding; rectal bleeding and diarrhea; and change in bowel habits. Being male and increasing age were also, in general, associated with increased risk of CRC.

conclusionRecognition of clinical features associated with increased risk of CRC by FPs might help with earlier identification and referral among patients presenting in primary care. This review might help inform providers and CRC diagnostic assessment programs about indications for assessment and further investigation.

Indexed as

Practice Guidelines as TopicColorectal NeoplasmsHumansPrimary Health Care

Identifiers

PMID25122831
PMCPMC4131977
OpenAlexW2163848079

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.