ArticleJournal of virology2014
Computational prediction of vaccine strains for human influenza A (H3N2) viruses.
Article in Journal of virology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
35 citing papers in PubMed, 61 citations in OpenAlex.
- Predicting the antigenic evolution of seasonal influenza viruses using phylogenetic convergence.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Article
- Article
- High-throughput neutralization measurements correlate strongly with evolutionary success of human influenza strains.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Influenza vaccine strain selection with an AI-based evolutionary and antigenicity model.Nature medicine · 2025Article
- Topolow: a mapping algorithm for antigenic cross-reactivity and binding affinity assays.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2025Article
- Seasonal antigenic prediction of influenza A H3N2 using machine learning.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Predictive evolutionary modelling for influenza virus by site-based dynamics of mutations.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Forecasting SARS-CoV-2 spike protein evolution from small data by deep learning and regression.Frontiers in systems biology · 2024Article
- Article
- Tracking the emergence of antigenic variants in influenza A virus epidemics in Brazil.Virus evolution · 2023Article
- Antigenic characterization of influenza and SARS-CoV-2 viruses.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2022Review
- In silico design of recombinant multi-epitope vaccine against influenza A virus.BMC bioinformatics · 2022Article
- Influenza immune escape under heterogeneous host immune histories.Trends in microbiology · 2021Review
- Article
- Limited Predictability of Amino Acid Substitutions in Seasonal Influenza Viruses.Molecular biology and evolution · 2021Article
- Modeling the selective advantage of new amino acids on the hemagglutinin of H1N1 influenza viruses using their patient age distributions.Virus evolution · 2021Article
- Advances in Development and Application of Influenza Vaccines.Frontiers in immunology · 2021Review
- Antigenicity prediction and vaccine recommendation of human influenza virus A (H3N2) using convolutional neural networks.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2020Article
- Challenges of Making Effective Influenza Vaccines.Annual review of virology · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Human influenza A viruses are rapidly evolving pathogens that cause substantial morbidity and mortality in seasonal epidemics around the globe. To ensure continued protection, the strains used for the production of the seasonal influenza vaccine have to be regularly updated, which involves data collection and analysis by numerous experts worldwide. Computer-guided analysis is becoming increasingly important in this problem due to the vast amounts of generated data. We here describe a computational method for selecting a suitable strain for production of the human influenza A virus vaccine. It interprets available antigenic and genomic sequence data based on measures of antigenic novelty and rate of propagation of the viral strains throughout the population. For viral isolates sampled between 2002 and 2007, we used this method to predict the antigenic evolution of the H3N2 viruses in retrospective testing scenarios. When seasons were scored as true or false predictions, our method returned six true positives, three false negatives, eight true negatives, and one false positive, or 78% accuracy overall. In comparison to the recommendations by the WHO, we identified the correct antigenic variant once at the same time and twice one season ahead. Even though it cannot be ruled out that practical reasons such as lack of a sufficiently well-growing candidate strain may in some cases have prevented recommendation of the best-matching strain by the WHO, our computational decision procedure allows quantitative interpretation of the growing amounts of data and may help to match the vaccine better to predominating strains in seasonal influenza epidemics. Importance: Human influenza A viruses continuously change antigenically to circumvent the immune protection evoked by vaccination or previously circulating viral strains. To maintain vaccine protection and thereby reduce the mortality and morbidity caused by infections, regular updates of the vaccine strains are required. We have developed a data-driven framework for vaccine strain prediction which facilitates the computational analysis of genetic and antigenic data and does not rely on explicit evolutionary models. Our computational decision procedure generated good matches of the vaccine strain to the circulating predominant strain for most seasons and could be used to support the expert-guided prediction made by the WHO; it thus may allow an increase in vaccine efficacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.