Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25122768›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of biological chemistry2014

Thiosulfate transfer mediated by DsrE/TusA homologs from acidothermophilic sulfur-oxidizing archaeon Metallosphaera cuprina.

Li-Jun Liu, Yvonne Stockdreher, Tobias Koch, Shu-Tao Sun, Zheng Fan, Michaele Josten, Hans-Georg Sahl, Qian Wang, Yuan-Ming Luo, Shuang-Jiang Liu and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of biological chemistry, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Knockout ofJournal of bacteriology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Draft Genome Sequence ofEvolutionary bioinformatics online · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. ONature communications · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. The Essential Role of OmpR inMicroorganisms · 2022
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Li-Jun LiuState Key Laboratory of Microbial Resources, Institute of Microbiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China,; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China, and.
Yvonne StockdreherInstitut für Mikrobiologie & Biotechnologie, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhems-Universität Bonn, 53115 Bonn, Germany.
Tobias KochInstitut für Mikrobiologie & Biotechnologie, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhems-Universität Bonn, 53115 Bonn, Germany.
Shu-Tao SunCore Facility and Institute of Microbiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China.
Zheng FanState Key Laboratory of Microbial Resources, Institute of Microbiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China.
Michaele JostenInstitut für Medizinische Mikrobiologie, Immunologie und Parasitologie, Abteilung Pharmazeutische Mikrobiologie, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany.
Hans-Georg SahlInstitut für Medizinische Mikrobiologie, Immunologie und Parasitologie, Abteilung Pharmazeutische Mikrobiologie, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany.
Qian WangState Key Laboratory of Microbial Resources, Institute of Microbiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China.
Yuan-Ming LuoState Key Laboratory of Microbial Resources, Institute of Microbiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China.
Shuang-Jiang LiuState Key Laboratory of Microbial Resources, Institute of Microbiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China,; Environmental Microbiology Research Center, Institute of Microbiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China,. Electronic address: liusj@im.ac.cn.
Christiane DahlInstitut für Mikrobiologie & Biotechnologie, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhems-Universität Bonn, 53115 Bonn, Germany,. Electronic address: ChDahl@uni-bonn.de.
Cheng-Ying JiangState Key Laboratory of Microbial Resources, Institute of Microbiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China,; Environmental Microbiology Research Center, Institute of Microbiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China,. Electronic address: jiangcy@im.ac.cn.
Chinese Academy of Sciences · CNUniversity of Bonn · DEInstitute of Microbiology · CNMicrobiology Institute of Shaanxi · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Conserved clusters of genes encoding DsrE and TusA homologs occur in many archaeal and bacterial sulfur oxidizers. TusA has a well documented function as a sulfurtransferase in tRNA modification and molybdenum cofactor biosynthesis in Escherichia coli, and DsrE is an active site subunit of the DsrEFH complex that is essential for sulfur trafficking in the phototrophic sulfur-oxidizing Allochromatium vinosum. In the acidothermophilic sulfur (S(0))- and tetrathionate (S4O6(2-))-oxidizing Metallosphaera cuprina Ar-4, a dsrE3A-dsrE2B-tusA arrangement is situated immediately between genes encoding dihydrolipoamide dehydrogenase and a heterodisulfide reductase-like complex. In this study, the biochemical features and sulfur transferring abilities of the DsrE2B, DsrE3A, and TusA proteins were investigated. DsrE3A and TusA proved to react with tetrathionate but not with NaSH, glutathione persulfide, polysulfide, thiosulfate, or sulfite. The products were identified as protein-Cys-S-thiosulfonates. DsrE3A was also able to cleave the thiosulfate group from TusA-Cys(18)-S-thiosulfonate. DsrE2B did not react with any of the sulfur compounds tested. DsrE3A and TusA interacted physically with each other and formed a heterocomplex. The cysteine residue (Cys(18)) of TusA is crucial for this interaction. The single cysteine mutants DsrE3A-C(93)S and DsrE3A-C(101)S retained the ability to transfer the thiosulfonate group to TusA. TusA-C(18)S neither reacted with tetrathionate nor was it loaded with thiosulfate with DsrE3A-Cys-S-thiosulfonate as the donor. The transfer of thiosulfate, mediated by a DsrE-like protein and TusA, is unprecedented not only in M. cuprina but also in other sulfur-oxidizing prokaryotes. The results of this study provide new knowledge on oxidative microbial sulfur metabolism.

Indexed as

Amino Acid SubstitutionArchaeal ProteinsCarrier ProteinsMultiprotein ComplexesMutation, MissenseOxidation-ReductionSequence Homology, Amino AcidSulfolobaceaeSulfurSulfurtransferasesArchaeal ProteinsCarrier ProteinsMultiprotein ComplexesSulfurSulfurtransferasesArchaeaDsrE/TusA-like ProteinsEnergy MetabolismMetallosphaera cuprinaMicrobiologyOxidation-Reduction (Redox)SulfurTetrathionateThiosulfate Transfer

Identifiers

PMID25122768
PMCPMC4175335
OpenAlexW2093382165

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.