Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25122747›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2014

Systematic exploration of a class of hydrophobic unnatural base pairs yields multiple new candidates for the expansion of the genetic alphabet.

Kirandeep Dhami, Denis A Malyshev, Phillip Ordoukhanian, Tomáš Kubelka, Michal Hocek, Floyd E Romesberg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Reverse transcription as key step in RNARSC chemical biology · 2024
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Stability of nucleic acid bases in concentrated sulfuric acid: Implications for the habitability of Venus' clouds.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. In vitro selection of aptamers and their applications.Nature reviews. Methods primers · 2023
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Next-generation genetic code expansion.Current opinion in chemical biology · 2018
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Helix instability and self-pairing prevent unnatural base pairs from expanding the genetic alphabet.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Article
  17. Article
  18. A semisynthetic organism engineered for the stable expansion of the genetic alphabet.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Article
  19. Evolvability Is an Evolved Ability: The Coding Concept as the Arch-Unit of Natural Selection.Origins of life and evolution of the biosphere : the journal of the International Society for the Study of the Origin of Life · 2016
    Article
  20. Overcoming Challenges in Engineering the Genetic Code.Journal of molecular biology · 2016
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kirandeep DhamiDepartment of Chemistry, The Scripps Research Institute, 10550 N. Torrey Pines Road, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA.
Denis A MalyshevDepartment of Chemistry, The Scripps Research Institute, 10550 N. Torrey Pines Road, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA.
Phillip OrdoukhanianCenter for Protein and Nucleic Acid Research, The Scripps Research Institute, 10550 N. Torrey Pines Road, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA.
Tomáš KubelkaInstitute of Organic Chemistry and Biochemistry, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Flemingovo nam. 2, CZ-16610 Prague 6, Czech Republic.
Michal HocekInstitute of Organic Chemistry and Biochemistry, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Flemingovo nam. 2, CZ-16610 Prague 6, Czech Republic Department of Organic Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Charles University in Prague, Hlavova 8, CZ-12843 Prague 2, Czech Republic.
Floyd E RomesbergDepartment of Chemistry, The Scripps Research Institute, 10550 N. Torrey Pines Road, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA floyd@scripps.edu.

Funding

EXPANDING THE GENETIC ALPHABET BY POLYMERASE EVOLUTIONR01GM060005 · NIGMS · SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE, THE · PI ROMESBERG, FLOYD E. · 1999 to 2015
$4.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM060005NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM060005
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We have developed a family of unnatural base pairs (UBPs), which rely on hydrophobic and packing interactions for pairing and which are well replicated and transcribed. While the pair formed between d5SICS and dNaM (d5SICS-dNaM) has received the most attention, and has been used to expand the genetic alphabet of a living organism, recent efforts have identified dTPT3-dNaM, which is replicated with even higher fidelity. These efforts also resulted in more UBPs than could be independently analyzed, and thus we now report a PCR-based screen to identify the most promising. While we found that dTPT3-dNaM is generally the most promising UBP, we identified several others that are replicated nearly as well and significantly better than d5SICS-dNaM, and are thus viable candidates for the expansion of the genetic alphabet of a living organism. Moreover, the results suggest that continued optimization should be possible, and that the putatively essential hydrogen-bond acceptor at the position ortho to the glycosidic linkage may not be required. These results clearly demonstrate the generality of hydrophobic forces for the control of base pairing within DNA, provide a wealth of new structure-activity relationship data and importantly identify multiple new candidates for in vivo evaluation and further optimization.

Indexed as

Genetic CodeBase PairingDeoxyribonucleotidesDNAHydrophobic and Hydrophilic InteractionsDeoxyribonucleotidesDNA

Identifiers

PMID25122747
PMCPMC4176363

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.