Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25122640›Full record

ReviewScience translational medicine2014

Lost but making progress--Where will new analgesic drugs come from?

David Borsook, Richard Hargreaves, Chas Bountra, Frank Porreca

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Science translational medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Chronic Pain and Opioids in the Elderly: Treating the Brain, Not Just the Body.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026
    Review
  7. BH4 Oxidation-Derived HJournal of neurochemistry · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

David BorsookCenter for Pain and the Brain, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Richard HargreavesCenter for Pain and the Brain, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Chas BountraDepartment of Clinical Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 2JD, UK.
Frank PorrecaCenter for Pain and the Brain and Department of Pharmacology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85724, USA. frankp@u.arizona.edu.

Funding

Brain reward circuits and relief of ongoing painR01DA034975 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI PORRECA, FRANK · 2013 to 2017
$2.8M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA034975Wellcome Trust 092809
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is a critical need for effective new pharmacotherapies for pain. The paucity of new drugs successfully reaching the clinic calls for a reassessment of current analgesic drug discovery approaches. Many points early in the discovery process present significant hurdles, making it critical to exploit advances in pain neurobiology to increase the probability of success. In this review, we highlight approaches that are being pursued vigorously by the pain community for drug discovery, including innovative preclinical pain models, insights from genetics, mechanistic phenotyping of pain patients, development of biomarkers, and emerging insights into chronic pain as a disorder of both the periphery and the brain. Collaborative efforts between pharmaceutical, academic, and public entities to advance research in these areas promise to de-risk potential targets, stimulate investment, and speed evaluation and development of better pain therapies.

Indexed as

Drug DiscoveryAnalgesicsChronic PainDrug Evaluation, PreclinicalHumansPainResearchAnalgesics

Identifiers

PMID25122640
PMCPMC4319979

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.