Re: "Estimated rate of reactivation of latent tuberculosis infection in the United States, overall and by population subgroup".

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Chronic Immune Activation in TB/HIV Co-infection.Trends in microbiology · 2020
   Review
2. Quantifying Limits on Replication, Death, and Quiescence of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in Mice.Frontiers in microbiology · 2016
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  Estimated rate of reactivation of latent tuberculosis infection in the United States, overall and by population subgroup.2014

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Funding

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as