Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25122497›Full record

Trial reportChest2014

Controlling asthma by training of Capnometry-Assisted Hypoventilation (CATCH) vs slow breathing: a randomized controlled trial.

Thomas Ritz, David Rosenfield, Ashton M Steele, Mark W Millard, Alicia E Meuret

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Chest, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00975273 (Targeting CO2 Levels in Breathing Training for Asthma), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00975273 nacompletednot on this map

Targeting CO2 Levels in Breathing Training for Asthma

TypeinterventionalSponsorSouthern Methodist UniversityRan2008 to 2013Enrolled120ConditionsASTHMAArmsCapnometry Assisted Respiration Training, Breathing Awareness
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Asthma: Biomedical and Psychobiological Perspectives.Biopsychosocial science and medicine · 2025
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. The sigh and related behaviors.Handbook of clinical neurology · 2022
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. An Anti-hyperventilation Instruction Decreases the Drop in End-tidal COApplied psychophysiology and biofeedback · 2019
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Hypoventilation Therapy Alleviates Panic by Repeated Induction of Dyspnea.Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging · 2018
    Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Thomas RitzFrom the Southern Methodist University, Dallas, TX.
David RosenfieldFrom the Southern Methodist University, Dallas, TX.
Ashton M SteeleFrom the Southern Methodist University, Dallas, TX.
Mark W MillardBaylor University Medical Center, Dallas, TX.
Alicia E MeuretFrom the Southern Methodist University, Dallas, TX. Electronic address: ameuret@smu.edu.
Southern Methodist University · USBaylor University Medical Center · US

Funding

Targeting CO2 levels in breathing training for asthmaR01HL089761 · NHLBI · SOUTHERN METHODIST UNIVERSITY · PI MEURET, ALICIA ESPERANZA, RITZ, THOMAS EKKEHARD · 2008 to 2011
$1.4M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL089761NHLBI NIH HHS R01-HL089761
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHyperventilation has been associated with adverse effects on lung function, symptoms, and well-being in asthma. We examined whether raising end-tidal CO2 levels (ie, Pco2) compared with slow breathing is associated with improvements in asthma control, including peak flow variability.

methodsOne hundred twenty patients with asthma were randomly assigned to capnometry-assisted respiratory training (CART) for raising Pco2 or slow breathing and awareness training (SLOW) for slowing respiratory rate. Patients received five weekly sessions and completed bid homework exercises over 4 weeks. Blinded assessments at baseline, posttreatment, 1- and 6-month follow-up of asthma control, Pco2, and diurnal peak flow variability were primary outcome measures. Additionally, we measured pulmonary function (spirometry, forced oscillation, exhaled nitric oxide, and methacholine challenge), symptoms, quality of life, and bronchodilator use. Because the control group received active treatment, we expected improvements in asthma control in both groups but more pronounced benefits from CART.

resultsImprovements were seen in 17 of 21 clinical indexes (81.0%) in both interventions, including the primary outcome variables asthma control (d = 0.81), peak flow variability (d = 0.54), quality of life, bronchodilator use, lung function, and airway hyperreactivity. Most improvements were sustained across the 6-month follow-up. Compared with slow breathing, CART showed greater increases in Pco2 (d = 1.45 vs 0.64 for CART vs SLOW, respectively) and greater reductions in respiratory impedance during treatment, less distress during methacholine challenge, and greater reduction in asthma symptoms at follow-up (P < .05).

conclusionsBrief interventions aimed at raising Pco2 or slowing respiratory rate provide significant, sustained, and clinically meaningful improvements in asthma control. Raising Pco2 was associated with greater benefits in aspects of lung function and long-term symptoms. TRIAL REGISTRY: ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT00975273; URL: www.clinicaltrials.gov.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAsthmaBlood Gas Monitoring, TranscutaneousExercise TherapyFemaleFollow-Up StudiesForced Expiratory VolumeHumansLungMaleMiddle AgedPeak Expiratory Flow RateQuality of LifeSpirometryYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID25122497
PMCPMC4219339
OpenAlexW2013785552

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.