Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25122477›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Surface physicochemistry and ionic strength affects eDNA's role in bacterial adhesion to abiotic surfaces.

Viduthalai R Regina, Arcot R Lokanathan, Jakub J Modrzyński, Duncan S Sutherland, Rikke L Meyer

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The role of extracellular DNA inJournal of bacteriology · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. The dental plaque biofilm matrix.Periodontology 2000 · 2021
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Deletion of D-Lactate Dehydrogenase A inFrontiers in microbiology · 2019
    Article
  11. Antivirulent Properties of UnderexploredFrontiers in microbiology · 2017
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Viduthalai R ReginaInterdisciplinary Nanoscience Center (iNANO), Aarhus C, Denmark.
Arcot R LokanathanInterdisciplinary Nanoscience Center (iNANO), Aarhus C, Denmark.
Jakub J ModrzyńskiInterdisciplinary Nanoscience Center (iNANO), Aarhus C, Denmark.
Duncan S SutherlandInterdisciplinary Nanoscience Center (iNANO), Aarhus C, Denmark.
Rikke L MeyerInterdisciplinary Nanoscience Center (iNANO), Aarhus C, Denmark; Department of Bioscience, Aarhus University, Aarhus C, Denmark.
Aarhus University · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Extracellular DNA (eDNA) is an important structural component of biofilms formed by many bacteria, but few reports have focused on its role in initial cell adhesion. The aim of this study was to investigate the role of eDNA in bacterial adhesion to abiotic surfaces, and determine to which extent eDNA-mediated adhesion depends on the physicochemical properties of the surface and surrounding liquid. We investigated eDNA alteration of cell surface hydrophobicity and zeta potential, and subsequently quantified the effect of eDNA on the adhesion of Staphylococcus xylosus to glass surfaces functionalised with different chemistries resulting in variable hydrophobicity and charge. Cell adhesion experiments were carried out at three different ionic strengths. Removal of eDNA from S. xylosus cells by DNase treatment did not alter the zeta potential, but rendered the cells more hydrophilic. DNase treatment impaired adhesion of cells to glass surfaces, but the adhesive properties of S. xylosus were regained within 30 minutes if DNase was not continuously present, implying a continuous release of eDNA in the culture. Removal of eDNA lowered the adhesion of S. xylosus to all surfaces chemistries tested, but not at all ionic strengths. No effect was seen on glass surfaces and carboxyl-functionalised surfaces at high ionic strength, and a reverse effect occurred on amine-functionalised surfaces at low ionic strength. However, eDNA promoted adhesion of cells to hydrophobic surfaces irrespective of the ionic strength. The adhesive properties of eDNA in mediating initial adhesion of S. xylosus is thus highly versatile, but also dependent on the physicochemical properties of the surface and ionic strength of the surrounding medium.

Indexed as

Bacterial AdhesionBiofilmsDNA, BacterialGlassHydrophobic and Hydrophilic InteractionsOsmolar ConcentrationStaphylococcusSurface PropertiesDNA, Bacterial

Identifiers

PMID25122477
PMCPMC4133339
OpenAlexW2095263747

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.