ArticlePloS one2014
Surface physicochemistry and ionic strength affects eDNA's role in bacterial adhesion to abiotic surfaces.
Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- The role of extracellular DNA inJournal of bacteriology · 2026Review
- Probing biofilm development, stress response and heterogeneity-spectroscopic characterization of single and multi-species consortia.NPJ biofilms and microbiomes · 2026Article
- Investigating Extracellular DNA Release inMicroorganisms · 2021Article
- Biosurfactant synergized with marine bacterial DNase disrupts polymicrobial biofilms.Folia microbiologica · 2021Article
- Extracellular DNA (eDNA). A Major Ubiquitous Element of the Bacterial Biofilm Architecture.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Carboxy-Terminal Processing Protease Controls Production of Outer Membrane Vesicles and Biofilm inMicroorganisms · 2021Article
- The dental plaque biofilm matrix.Periodontology 2000 · 2021Review
- Monoclonal Antibodies Specific to the Extracellular Domain of Histidine Kinase YycG ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2020Article
- Combined Effects Of Low Incubation Temperature, Minimal Growth Medium, And Low Hydrodynamics OptimizeInfection and drug resistance · 2019Article
- Deletion of D-Lactate Dehydrogenase A inFrontiers in microbiology · 2019Article
- Antivirulent Properties of UnderexploredFrontiers in microbiology · 2017Article
- A hybrid dielectrophoretic system for trapping of microorganisms from water.Biomicrofluidics · 2015Article
- A short review of fecal indicator bacteria in tropical aquatic ecosystems: knowledge gaps and future directions.Frontiers in microbiology · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Extracellular DNA (eDNA) is an important structural component of biofilms formed by many bacteria, but few reports have focused on its role in initial cell adhesion. The aim of this study was to investigate the role of eDNA in bacterial adhesion to abiotic surfaces, and determine to which extent eDNA-mediated adhesion depends on the physicochemical properties of the surface and surrounding liquid. We investigated eDNA alteration of cell surface hydrophobicity and zeta potential, and subsequently quantified the effect of eDNA on the adhesion of Staphylococcus xylosus to glass surfaces functionalised with different chemistries resulting in variable hydrophobicity and charge. Cell adhesion experiments were carried out at three different ionic strengths. Removal of eDNA from S. xylosus cells by DNase treatment did not alter the zeta potential, but rendered the cells more hydrophilic. DNase treatment impaired adhesion of cells to glass surfaces, but the adhesive properties of S. xylosus were regained within 30 minutes if DNase was not continuously present, implying a continuous release of eDNA in the culture. Removal of eDNA lowered the adhesion of S. xylosus to all surfaces chemistries tested, but not at all ionic strengths. No effect was seen on glass surfaces and carboxyl-functionalised surfaces at high ionic strength, and a reverse effect occurred on amine-functionalised surfaces at low ionic strength. However, eDNA promoted adhesion of cells to hydrophobic surfaces irrespective of the ionic strength. The adhesive properties of eDNA in mediating initial adhesion of S. xylosus is thus highly versatile, but also dependent on the physicochemical properties of the surface and ionic strength of the surrounding medium.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.