Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25122123›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

The frequency and determinants of liver stiffness measurement failure: a retrospective study of "real-life" 38,464 examinations.

Dong Ji, Qing Shao, Ping Han, Fan Li, Bing Li, Hong Zang, Xiaoxia Niu, Zhongbin Li, Shaojie Xin, Guofeng Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. [Consensus on clinical application of transient elastography detecting liver fibrosis: a 2018 update].Zhonghua gan zang bing za zhi = Zhonghua ganzangbing zazhi = Chinese journal of hepatology · 2019
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Dong JiLiver Fibrosis Diagnosis and Treatment Center, 302 Military Hospital of China, Beijing, China.
Qing ShaoLiver Fibrosis Diagnosis and Treatment Center, 302 Military Hospital of China, Beijing, China.
Ping HanTumor Radiotherapy Center, 302 Military Hospital of China, Beijing, China.
Fan LiLiver Fibrosis Diagnosis and Treatment Center, 302 Military Hospital of China, Beijing, China.
Bing LiLiver Fibrosis Diagnosis and Treatment Center, 302 Military Hospital of China, Beijing, China.
Hong ZangLiver Failure Diagnosis and Treatment Center, 302 Military Hospital of China, Beijing, China.
Xiaoxia NiuLiver Fibrosis Diagnosis and Treatment Center, 302 Military Hospital of China, Beijing, China.
Zhongbin LiLiver Fibrosis Diagnosis and Treatment Center, 302 Military Hospital of China, Beijing, China.
Shaojie XinLiver Failure Diagnosis and Treatment Center, 302 Military Hospital of China, Beijing, China.
Guofeng ChenLiver Fibrosis Diagnosis and Treatment Center, 302 Military Hospital of China, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo investigate the frequency and determinants of liver stiffness measurement (LSM) failure by means of FibroScan in "real-life" Chinese patients.

methodsA total of 38,464 "real-life" Chinese patients in 302 military hospital of China through the whole year of 2013, including asymptomatic carrier, chronic hepatitis B, chronic hepatitis C, liver cirrhosis (LC), alcoholic liver disease, autoimmune liver disease, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and other, were enrolled, their clinical and biological parameters were retrospectively investigated. Liver fibrosis was evaluated by FibroScan detection. S probe (for children with height less than 1.20 m) and M probe (for adults) were used. LSM failure defined as zero valid shots (unsuccessful LSM), or the ratio of the interquartile range to the median of 10 measurements (IQR/M) greater than 0.30 plus median LSM greater or equal to 7.1 kPa (unreliable LSM).

resultsLSM failure occurred in 3.34% of all examinations (1286 patients out of 38,464), among them, there were 958 cases (2.49%) with unsuccessful LSM, and 328 patients (0.85%) with unreliable LSM. Statistical analyses showed that LSM failure was independently associated with body mass index (BMI) greater than 30 kg/m(2), female sex, age greater than 50 years, intercostal spaces (IS) less than 9 mm, decompensated liver cirrhosis and HCC patients. There were no significant differences among other diseases. By changing another skilled operator, success was achieved on 301 cases out of 1286, which reduced the failure rate to 2.56%, the decrease was significant (P<0.0001).

conclusionsThe principal reasons of LSM failure are ascites, obesity and narrow of IS. The failure rates of HCC, decompensated LC, elder or female patients are higher. These results emphasize the need for adequate operator training, technological improvements and optimal criteria for specific patient subpopulations.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBody Mass IndexChildChinaCohort StudiesFemaleHumansLiverLiver CirrhosisMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID25122123
PMCPMC4133303

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.