Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25122102›Full record

ReviewAmerican journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation2014

Disease-in-a-dish: the contribution of patient-specific induced pluripotent stem cell technology to regenerative rehabilitation.

David L Mack, Xuan Guan, Ashley Wagoner, Stephen J Walker, Martin K Childers

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Everything You Always Wanted to Know About Organoid-Based Models (and Never Dared to Ask).Cellular and molecular gastroenterology and hepatology · 2022
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Microfluidic Organ-on-a-Chip Models of Human Intestine.Cellular and molecular gastroenterology and hepatology · 2018
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

David L MackFrom the Department of Rehabilitation Medicine and Institute for Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle (DLM, XG, MKC); and Department of Physiology and Pharmacology (XG) and Department of Neuroscience and the Wake Forest Institute for Regenerative Medicine (AW, SJW), Wake Forest University Health Sciences, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.
Xuan Guan
Ashley Wagoner
Stephen J Walker
Martin K Childers
Minami Kyushu Junior College · JP

Funding

Studies in Translational Regenerative MedicineT32EB014836 · NIBIB · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI ANTHONY ATALA, Victoria Weis · 2013 to 2026
$1.7M
NIBIB NIH HHS T32 EB014836
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Advances in regenerative medicine technologies will lead to dramatic changes in how patients in rehabilitation medicine clinics are treated in the upcoming decades. The multidisciplinary field of regenerative medicine is developing new tools for disease modeling and drug discovery based on induced pluripotent stem cells. This approach capitalizes on the idea of personalized medicine by using the patient's own cells to discover new drugs, increasing the likelihood of a favorable outcome. The search for compounds that can correct disease defects in the culture dish is a conceptual departure from how drug screens were done in the past. This system proposes a closed loop from sample collection from the diseased patient, to in vitro disease model, to drug discovery and Food and Drug Administration approval, to delivering that drug back to the same patient. Here, recent progress in patient-specific induced pluripotent stem cell derivation, directed differentiation toward diseased cell types, and how those cells can be used for high-throughput drug screens are reviewed. Given that restoration of normal function is a driving force in rehabilitation medicine, the authors believe that this drug discovery platform focusing on phenotypic rescue will become a key contributor to therapeutic compounds in regenerative rehabilitation.

Indexed as

Induced Pluripotent Stem CellsAnimalsBioengineeringCellular ReprogrammingDrug DiscoveryForecastingHumansNeuromuscular DiseasesPhysical and Rehabilitation MedicinePrecision MedicineQuality ImprovementRegenerative MedicineStem Cell TransplantationTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID25122102
PMCPMC7978494
OpenAlexW2128243430

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.