Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25121979›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Population-based Stroke Atlas for outcome prediction: method and preliminary results for ischemic stroke from CT.

Wieslaw L Nowinski, Varsha Gupta, Guoyu Qian, Wojciech Ambrosius, Radoslaw Kazmierski

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Human brain atlasing: past, present and future.The neuroradiology journal · 2017
    Review
  8. The Association between Diffusion MRI-Defined Infarct Volume and NIHSS Score in Patients with Minor Acute Stroke.Journal of neuroimaging : official journal of the American Society of Neuroimaging · 2017
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Wieslaw L NowinskiBiomedical Imaging Lab, Singapore Bioimaging Consortium, Agency for Science Technology and Research, Singapore, Singapore.
Varsha GuptaBiomedical Imaging Lab, Singapore Bioimaging Consortium, Agency for Science Technology and Research, Singapore, Singapore.
Guoyu QianBiomedical Imaging Lab, Singapore Bioimaging Consortium, Agency for Science Technology and Research, Singapore, Singapore.
Wojciech AmbrosiusBiomedical Imaging Lab, Singapore Bioimaging Consortium, Agency for Science Technology and Research, Singapore, Singapore; Department of Neurology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland.
Radoslaw KazmierskiDepartment of Neurology and Cerebrovascular Disorders (L. Bierkowski Hospital), Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland.
Agency for Science, Technology and Research · SGSingapore Bioimaging Consortium · SGPoznan University of Medical Sciences · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeKnowledge of outcome prediction is important in stroke management. We propose a lesion size and location-driven method for stroke outcome prediction using a Population-based Stroke Atlas (PSA) linking neurological parameters with neuroimaging in population. The PSA aggregates data from previously treated patients and applies them to currently treated patients. The PSA parameter distribution in the infarct region of a treated patient enables prediction. We introduce a method for PSA calculation, quantify its performance, and use it to illustrate ischemic stroke outcome prediction of modified Rankin Scale (mRS) and Barthel Index (BI).

methodsThe preliminary PSA was constructed from 128 ischemic stroke cases calculated for 8 variants (various data aggregation schemes) and 3 case selection variables (infarct volume, NIHSS at admission, and NIHSS at day 7), each in 4 ranges. Outcome prediction for 9 parameters (mRS at 7th, and mRS and BI at 30th, 90th, 180th, 360th day) was studied using a leave-one-out approach, requiring 589,824 PSA maps to be analyzed.

resultsOutcomes predicted for different PSA variants are statistically equivalent, so the simplest and most efficient variant aiming at parameter averaging is employed. This variant allows the PSA to be pre-calculated before prediction. The PSA constrained by infarct volume and NIHSS reduces the average prediction error (absolute difference between the predicted and actual values) by a fraction of 0.796; the use of 3 patient-specific variables further lowers it by 0.538. The PSA-based prediction error for mild and severe outcomes (mRS  =  [2]-[5]) is (0.5-0.7). Prediction takes about 8 seconds.

conclusionsPSA-based prediction of individual and group mRS and BI scores over time is feasible, fast and simple, but its clinical usefulness requires further studies. The case selection operation improves PSA predictability. A multiplicity of PSAs can be computed independently for different datasets at various centers and easily merged, which enables building powerful PSAs over the community.

Indexed as

BrainBrain IschemiaHumansMiddle AgedNeuroimagingOutcome Assessment, Health CareStrokeTomography, X-Ray Computed

Identifiers

PMID25121979
PMCPMC4133199
OpenAlexW1999233423

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.