Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25121966›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Genome-wide association analysis of radiation resistance in Drosophila melanogaster.

Mahesh Vaisnav, Chao Xing, Hung-Chih Ku, Daniel Hwang, Strahinja Stojadinovic, Alexander Pertsemlidis, John M Abrams

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. DNA repair in tumor radioresistance: insights from fruit flies genetics.Cellular oncology (Dordrecht, Netherlands) · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. The road less traveled: from genotype to phenotype in flies and humans.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2018
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Mahesh VaisnavDepartment of Cell Biology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, United States of America.
Chao XingMcDermott Center for Human Growth and Development, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, United States of America.
Hung-Chih KuMcDermott Center for Human Growth and Development, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, United States of America.
Daniel HwangDepartment of Cell Biology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, United States of America.
Strahinja StojadinovicDepartment of Radiation Oncology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, United States of America.
Alexander PertsemlidisGreehey Children's Cancer Research Institute, Departments of Pediatrics and Cellular & Structural Biology, UT Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, United States of America.
John M AbramsDepartment of Cell Biology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, United States of America.
Southwestern Medical Center · USThe University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · USThe University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio · US

Funding

Cell Biology Research Improvements and RenovationsC06RR030414 · NCRR · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI FITZ, JOHN GREGORY · 2010 to 2010
$15.0M
Molecular and Genetic Control of Programmed Cell DeathR01GM072124 · NIGMS · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI ABRAMS, JOHN M · 2004 to 2016
$4.4M
NCRR NIH HHS C06 RR030414NCRR NIH HHS C06 RR30414NIGMS NIH HHS NIH R01GM072124NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM072124
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIonizing radiation is genotoxic to cells. Healthy tissue toxicity in patients and radiation resistance in tumors present common clinical challenges in delivering effective radiation therapies. Radiation response is a complex, polygenic trait with unknown genetic determinants. The Drosophila Genetic Reference Panel (DGRP) provides a model to investigate the genetics of natural variation for sensitivity to radiation. METHODS AND

findingsRadiation response was quantified in 154 inbred DGRP lines, among which 92 radiosensitive lines and 62 radioresistant lines were classified as controls and cases, respectively. A case-control genome-wide association screen for radioresistance was performed. There are 32 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with radio resistance at a nominal p<10(-5); all had modest effect sizes and were common variants with the minor allele frequency >5%. All the genes implicated by those SNP hits were novel, many without a known role in radiation resistance and some with unknown function. Variants in known DNA damage and repair genes associated with radiation response were below the significance threshold of p<10(-5) and were not present among the significant hits. No SNP met the genome-wide significance threshold (p = 1.49 × 10(-7)), indicating a necessity for a larger sample size.

conclusionsSeveral genes not previously associated with variation in radiation resistance were identified. These genes, especially the ones with human homologs, form the basis for exploring new pathways involved in radiation resistance in novel functional studies. An improved DGRP model with a sample size of at least 265 lines and ideally up to 793 lines is recommended for future studies of complex traits.

Indexed as

Genome-Wide Association StudyAnimalsDrosophila melanogasterPolymorphism, Single NucleotideRadiation Tolerance

Identifiers

PMID25121966
PMCPMC4133248
OpenAlexW1992330648

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.