SynthesisPloS one2014
Task shifting for non-communicable disease management in low and middle income countries--a systematic review.
Synthesis in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03376607 (Community- and mHealth-Based Integrated Management of Diabetes in Primary Healthcare in Rwanda), which is not on this map. Cited by 354 papers, 15 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Community- and mHealth-Based Integrated Management of Diabetes in Primary Healthcare in Rwanda: The D²Rwanda Study
Who cites it
354 citing papers in PubMed, 15 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Community health worker-led interventions for cardio-metabolic diseases in India: Evidence from a systematic review and meta-analysis.The Indian journal of medical research · 2026Pooled it
- Barriers and facilitators to integrating non-communicable disease care within primary healthcare systems in low-resource countries: a systematic review.BMC health services research · 2026Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Global evidence on the effectiveness of task-shifting and task-sharing strategies for managing individuals with multimorbidity: systematic review and meta-analysis.Family medicine and community health · 2025Pooled it
- Eye health promotion in multi-sectoral settings: A systematic review of intervention types and effectiveness.F1000Research · 2025Pooled it
- Interventions to improve pharmacists' competency in chronic disease management: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.BMC medical education · 2024Pooled it
- Diabetes care components effectively implemented in the ASEAN health systems: an umbrella review of systematic reviews.BMJ open · 2023Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Family participation to enhance care and tackle health worker shortages in resource-limited hospitals: A systematic review.Journal of global health · 2023Pooled it
- Interventions to promote medication adherence for chronic diseases in India: a systematic review.Frontiers in public health · 2023Pooled it
- Effectiveness of oral health promotion interventions for people with type 2 diabetes delivered by non-dental health care professionals: a systematic review.Global health action · 2022Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Emergency care with lay responders in underserved populations: a systematic review.Bulletin of the World Health Organization · 2021Pooled it
- Task-sharing interventions for improving control of diabetes in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis.The Lancet. Global health · 2021Pooled it
- Community health worker-led versus facility-based type 2 diabetes care in rural Lesotho: a cluster-randomized trial within the ComBaCaL cohort study.BMC medicine · 2026 · on this mapTrial
- Lay community health worker-led care with mobile decision support for uncontrolled hypertension: a cluster-randomized trial.Nature medicine · 2026Trial
- Trial
- Trial
- Trial
294 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundOne potential solution to limited healthcare access in low and middle income countries (LMIC) is task-shifting- the training of non-physician healthcare workers (NPHWs) to perform tasks traditionally undertaken by physicians. The aim of this paper is to conduct a systematic review of studies involving task-shifting for the management of non-communicable disease (NCD) in LMIC.
methodsA search strategy with the following terms "task-shifting", "non-physician healthcare workers", "community healthcare worker", "hypertension", "diabetes", "cardiovascular disease", "mental health", "depression", "chronic obstructive pulmonary disease", "respiratory disease", "cancer" was conducted using Medline via Pubmed and the Cochrane library. Two reviewers independently reviewed the databases and extracted the data.
findingsOur search generated 7176 articles of which 22 were included in the review. Seven studies were randomised controlled trials and 15 were observational studies. Tasks performed by NPHWs included screening for NCDs and providing primary health care. The majority of studies showed improved health outcomes when compared with usual healthcare, including reductions in blood pressure, increased uptake of medications and lower depression scores. Factors such as training of NPHWs, provision of algorithms and protocols for screening, treatment and drug titration were the main enablers of the task-shifting intervention. The main barriers identified were restrictions on prescribing medications and availability of medicines. Only two studies described cost-effective analyses, both of which demonstrated that task-shifting was cost-effective.
conclusionsTask-shifting from physicians to NPHWs, if accompanied by health system re-structuring is a potentially effective and affordable strategy for improving access to healthcare for NCDs. Since the majority of study designs reviewed were of inadequate quality, future research methods should include robust evaluations of such strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.