Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25121762›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2014

Unveiling time in dose-response models to infer host susceptibility to pathogens.

Delphine Pessoa, Caetano Souto-Maior, Erida Gjini, Joao S Lopes, Bruno Ceña, Cláudia T Codeço, M Gabriela M Gomes

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Delphine PessoaInstituto Gulbenkian de Ciência, Oeiras, Portugal.
Caetano Souto-MaiorInstituto Gulbenkian de Ciência, Oeiras, Portugal.
Erida GjiniInstituto Gulbenkian de Ciência, Oeiras, Portugal.
Joao S LopesInstituto Gulbenkian de Ciência, Oeiras, Portugal.
Bruno CeñaInstituto Gulbenkian de Ciência, Oeiras, Portugal.
Cláudia T CodeçoPrograma de Computação Científica, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
M Gabriela M GomesInstituto Gulbenkian de Ciência, Oeiras, Portugal.
Instituto Gulbenkian de Ciência · PTFundação Oswaldo Cruz · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The biological effects of interventions to control infectious diseases typically depend on the intensity of pathogen challenge. As much as the levels of natural pathogen circulation vary over time and geographical location, the development of invariant efficacy measures is of major importance, even if only indirectly inferrable. Here a method is introduced to assess host susceptibility to pathogens, and applied to a detailed dataset generated by challenging groups of insect hosts (Drosophila melanogaster) with a range of pathogen (Drosophila C Virus) doses and recording survival over time. The experiment was replicated for flies carrying the Wolbachia symbiont, which is known to reduce host susceptibility to viral infections. The entire dataset is fitted by a novel quantitative framework that significantly extends classical methods for microbial risk assessment and provides accurate distributions of symbiont-induced protection. More generally, our data-driven modeling procedure provides novel insights for study design and analyses to assess interventions.

Indexed as

Disease SusceptibilityDrosophila melanogasterModels, BiologicalAnimalsDicistroviridaeHost-Pathogen InteractionsMaleSurvival AnalysisSymbiosisWolbachia

Identifiers

PMID25121762
PMCPMC4133050
OpenAlexW1967482854

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.